The story appears simple on the surface, but is revealed, especially after multiple viewings, as more multi-layered and textured than Cassavetes at his best. Ostensibly it concerns a 14-year old Catholic girl, Wynne (Agutter) growing up in this post-modern wasteland, who develops a crush on her much older adoptive brother (Marshall)- a crush which perversely deepens and grows into infatuation once she starts to believe he is the local sex killer. This is in itself an idea that makes you sit up and jolt, but as the narrative develops, it continues not necessarily along a linear path but in several confusing and fascinating directions: the family's history, (detailed effectively in chilling flashback during an improvised seance) is a chequered one, and has suffered at least one major relocation and upheaval in the last ten years. At the crux, however, it's the depiction of socialal changes that make I Start Counting so fascinating and elevate its language far beyond the confines of the standard horror film. The major subtext- that teenage girls were maturing more quickly than before, and developing full sexual and romantic appetites (even if in thought rather than deed) but were not possessed of enough discretion to make the right choices- was a step forward for a genre in which its young females had previously been portrayed as bimbo victims (Cover Girl Killer and The Night Caller spring to mind), but not one that all viewers would necessarily agree with. But most striking of all, and possibly the most enduring image which the viewer will take away with them, is of the masterful symbolism with which director Greene invests every shot. Every inch of the Kinch family's world- their house, their walls, their TV, Agutters underwear, bedroom furniture and toys, Sutcliffe's clothes, Marshalls van, the local Catholic church, their town centre, their record shop) - is painted a bright, scintillating white- a white which, by inference, is slowly becoming smudged and corrupted with the dirt of the outside world. White also symbolises, of course, purity and innocence (two qualities Catholic schoolgirls are supposed to hold dear), and it is into this world of innocence that the ever-present red bus (a symbol of violation and penetration), conducted by the lecherous yet similarly juvenile Simon Ward, makes regular journeys. The allegory is further expanded in one scene where Agutter believes she sees the Christ figure in church weeping blood: by the time we acknowledge it, its gone, but the seed has already been planted. Rarely in a genre production has the use of colour and background been so important or effective in creating a uniformity of mood. I Start Counting is as near-perfect an end to a decade as one could hope for, and exactly the kind of film people should be making now- which is, of course, exactly why they never will. A genre essential. by D.R.
过于算计了，所谓的批判不过是想撬动大众情绪，用力还那么刻意，煽情并消费情绪可能就是传说中的票房秘密吧。
七月开机，十二月上映，难怪拍出来这种东西。只能说陈思诚自以为抓住了所谓的“下沉”密码吧。
我不太情愿从创作动机来批评一部电影，但误杀2蹭第一部的热度不说，连IP融合的尝试都没有去做，摆出一副反正我献礼父亲反对强权你们不好意思骂我的姿态，未免太过分了吧？合着现在搬运别人故事都能搬出自己的品牌了？就算你考虑到国内观众对“悬疑”的偏爱把原作改得一波N折挺吸引眼球的，但核心的东西还是人家的，你自己的东西每一处都是硬伤，这不能就这么蒙混过关啊。总之，一句话，此风断不可涨也！！
肖央这次的林日朗绝了，一个走投无路的父亲，为了患病的孩子做出了难以置信的决定。孩子生病住院本是最正常的求助路径，可面对看不见的灰色障碍，普通人的无助却那样清晰，太难了。我觉得林日朗的选择是迫不得已，其实他从一开始就没有想过伤及无辜，只是想要捍卫原本就属于他们的幸福而已。最打动我的人除了林日朗，还有张正义，他们代表着某种意义上的良心，一个提前写好了自己的结局，一个读懂了结局的意义，莫名有种惺惺相惜之感。这的确又是一场误杀，但是一次精心设计过的付出，如果你看懂了它的伟大，就一定明白这伟大背后的意义。所以，就算猜到了结局也不影响它的感人，有些爱就是这么彻底和无私。
煽情戏份略重。男主妻子扮演者口音有点出戏，女记者的戏份牵强了些。与误杀1没什么关系。
两星半，预告远远大于正片。正片的过于套路，节奏也很一般。
臃肿的前两幕充满了各种煽情和套路，肖央虽然是个好演员，但毕竟缺乏原版丹泽尔华盛顿式的人格魅力，无法让人集中注意，导致观影过程无比疲倦，第三幕的改编虽然出人意料，但得警察配合别打心脏才行。另外李治廷才是大boss，市委秘书长带人强攻劫持市长的绑匪，必须服你。看到久违的张世和尹子维加一星。
豆瓣这是被劫持了吗，这么好的片被喷成这样。反正我是看哭了。也不觉得情节有什么不合理。难道爸爸被打死不是某种意义上的误杀吗?从爱奇艺的弹幕来看，大部分也都觉得拍的好，很感人。“我们可以卑微的或者，但是不能像虫子一样踩死”
作为电影来讲不好看，作为真实事件来讲很震撼。
看到了工业化，反而没看到故事。人物脸谱，剧情简单，批量生产的10后港片质感。
这个系列最大特点不是所谓的不畏强权，而是彻头彻尾的套路、刻意，都是假把式，人物为了反转而行事，所以最后也都是假大空，整个大阴谋还不如谈谈医闹。上一部好歹有陈冲谭卓，这部女演员都一言难尽
太搞笑了，他儿子的病本来就是心脏太大了，结果给换了个更大的。但是因为是父爱主题，又不忍心给一星……无语，被拿捏了
看了场《误杀2》，听后排小姐姐哭了20多分钟！片子牛逼！看完最大感想，现在养个娃已经不是费钱了，还得搭命！万一是二胎，可能小两口都得搭进去。难怪现在年轻人都不结婚生娃了，有钱给自己花不香么？？
2的剧情可以说是毫无悬念
表面看起来是表演的问题，其实全是导演的锅。煽情多的令人头皮发麻，角色不停的哭或悲拗来渲染悲情氛围，后半都快十分钟一哭了，按头观众感动，整个节奏混乱崩塌，显得剧创团队十分不自信。本来这个改写的故事还算扎实，外国的框，中式的心，但生怕大家不懂，强行加入各种明示画面。陈思诚的水平基本见底了，所有戏一到揭示时刻倾盆大雨就哗啦啦啦……that's soooo boring。两星半。
不得不承认陈思诚团队在商业IP开发上面的驾轻就熟，真的是做一个成一个，但是也正因为在这方面太会算计，所以也难免会出现专业观众和普通观众审美割裂的一个问题吧。其实有点儿和唐探系列类似的感觉，票房会更高，但是口碑则会下降。我也承认要兼顾市场和艺术还是很难的。误杀2在商业类型爽片的角度来说还是很到位的，无论是快速剪辑，插叙结构，情绪调动，反转设置都非常成熟，但是对于深谙悬疑片套路的人来说，真的毫不意外，几乎每个伏笔和转折都被猜到了。当然电影的一些讽刺本身是有价值的，尤其是对群众的讽刺是可贵的，但是某种程度又被电影的商业套路给消解掉了。什么时候陈思诚可以放放他在商业上的野心，在艺术表达上去追求一种极致呢？当然拍电影为了挣钱也没错，更何况当下市场上连合格的爆米花电影都不多，也不能苛求啥了。
PS：我要去给原版减星了。。。╮(╯▽╰)╭
一边看 一边内心大喊救命 这种剧本都能拍
再补充一下吧。我看这种本来能拍好但最后就是差点儿意思的电影就特别生气。有些地方逻辑不通啊。既然那个记者那么有正义感，为什么前面拒绝帮助林日朗？成人的心脏可以移植给孩子吗？林日朗居然可以跟市长达成和解？秘书长为什么对市长那么无条件的忠心？最后高利贷怎么还了？另外，后面又太煽情了。再加上最后那个行凶未遂的男的，这个角色太让人生气了。尤其是在林日朗坟前说的那句话，真的让人生理不适了。凭什么啊？你事情没搞清楚你就就要杀人了？怎么滴，这个没被你杀掉的医生还得谢谢你是吗？这样一个绝对算不上好人的人却在电影里一定程度地充当了正义的角色，他还打黄毛，他凭什么啊？
换个名字翻牌电影还可以马马虎虎，资本非要套着前作的名头🙄真差得不是一星半点，明明就是两部不搭嘎的电影，资本圈钱真过分！如果用心拍圈钱也就算了，但这…
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
