Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
建议大家看完邓布利多血虐侄儿那段之后就起身离开电影院，算是本片唯一的亮点了, 可以节约很多时间。
视觉效果还是挺好的，片名可以改成《邓布利多的弟弟的隐私》
抛开那些爽文的因素，总会让我想起来十一年前那个炎热的下午，和那两天中午的肯德基
两星半，第一部在差和还行间犹豫，好多招都太老套了。但那段演奏圆周率确实打动人。咱们这边完全可以翻拍啊，只要把脱北者那段背景刨掉。夜叉和这片，都特别行活，但不知道咱这边能不能做出这种行活。
很喜欢，很燃，很像菜英文那部。小男主好像@流浪人鱼
·神奇动物在哪？在哪啊？
澳洲真的大毒物奇多，而且天下奇毒。这个动物园原型貌似离我住的地方很近，但是我还从来没去过，我也从来没有见过考拉
看得我打瞌睡，剧情也是平平无奇，光靠几只神奇动物凑出点看点，格林德沃的动机看得我一脸懵逼。
太可爱了，太有爱了、鳄鱼妈妈好棒！那些小动物们好棒👍🏿最喜欢后面一家团聚都有爱的时候……团结一致！其实人和动物真的没必要那么针锋相对，互不干扰就好！但是欲望来了，人性真的好可怕
神奇动物以及每个角色间的羁绊越发动人，而这一次的动作场面绝对算得上精彩绝伦！此外，一些幽默桥段以及悬疑戏份直接将影片的趣味性和节奏感拉满！再一次深陷魔法世界！期待续集～
如果这个片类比一个剧本杀，就是作者花里胡哨搞了一大堆，你推理了5个小时之后，发现凶手只是拿刀捅了对方，刀还在凶手口袋里搜出来的，然后就开始进入情感环节——我一个很喜欢神奇动物的，来看首映的人建议，别看了，节约生命。
可爱也挺好笑的，但我看到澳洲大蜘蛛或蟒蛇还是会立刻跑走保命要紧
全片都是以一种儿童文学的梗去编织正传故事，可以用更放松的心情去看。优点是故事完整；政治阴谋到几段感情羁绊都有始有终；几场大特效都非常好，尤其是魔杖战斗，是我见过制作最精良的；洞窟趣味性十足，回到了密室的记忆中；巷战用霍格沃兹的东西也很亲切。缺点是关键剧情儿戏化，反视计划、黑人卧底、巷战换包、夺权失败，都跟闹着玩似的
影片很真诚的一点是，没有尝试用动画的形式去美化这些"丑陋"的动物，有些镜头甚至有些不适，但这正是影片表达的，影片自身的完成也本就印证了对追寻真实的自我是能够实现的。
看不懂其实可以看看前作的时间线整理，看之前去复习了一下，其实觉得比第二部好看多了，只要知道谁是谁时间线是怎样的就知道每个人在做什么了，少年魔咒真的好那个……赫院人真的看不得这样对待小动物，我真的一开场就看哭了……谁受得了。纯路人，只要懂神奇动物时间线都觉得好看……
剧情有些套路，关于数学或者说学习的看法还有些东西，可以给学生们看看
动物园丑动物出逃记，重新认识美丑和定义自我归属的过程。
剧情真是蠢哭了，好在有麦叔朋友们，麦叔是真的帅
选择做正确的事，不要做容易的事。
看不懂其实可以看看前作的时间线整理，看之前去复习了一下，其实觉得比第二部好看多了，只要知道谁是谁时间线是怎样的就知道每个人在做什么了，少年魔咒真的好那个……赫院人真的看不得这样对待小动物，我真的一开场就看哭了……谁受得了。纯路人，只要懂神奇动物时间线都觉得好看……
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
