Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
女知青、文工团、芭蕾舞、照相馆、杀人案、画像师、悬案，这些元素被国产悬疑片翻来覆去地拍，比的就是哪个更有新意。显然本片从剧作和摄影上只能说乏善可陈，缺乏那种新意，最后的反转也没有丝毫意外。还有，和石黑一雄没有一毛钱关系……
松板桃李还是值得信任的，至少看到了他努力的完成这个角色和本身他性格就不是孤狼，其实他尽力了
7.5
不是说一味地模仿是错，毕竟艺术创作很多时候都来源于经典，但2022年的犯罪题材电影依旧走不出杀人回忆的光环确实也让人不禁有些感叹
一般般吧，画面不错，气氛也不错，可惜故事生搬硬套，逻辑不通，容易让人出戏。
日冈比大上还是差远了，不过松坂这小平头挺精神的。铃木小变态死了，第三部不知道该咋拍了
片长和节奏，好像一个人写文章，一直用同样的笔调和语气，磨磨唧唧地写了好长好长，看得好累！所有角色说话都语重心长，都好似背着一副重担又要说出几句极富深意的道理来。构想不错，bug太大，逻辑不通顺。
5/10。氛围、摄影都对了，可惜实在太多bug了，既然是一部悬疑、刑侦片，实在无法忽视。大半夜，嫌疑人面目全非，竟然可以根据目击证人的证词画出精准画像，真的不科学；走私枪支的案件的插入，过于工具化，就是为了推进剧情而突然插入；还有严华发现林音尸体立即掩埋而不报警，也说不过去。不过，至少路线对了，如果能够好好打磨剧作，会是一部佳作。
看到了孤狼的日冈仿佛看到了当年的大上，害怕、恐慌、追随……
为铃木亮平而看，他也太适合演黑社会了哈哈哈全程血赤呼啦的
总想挨一点《杀人回忆》，可除了怀旧的滤镜和台词里偶然提起的时代符号，其它都显得冗长和无趣。
节奏和意境都很不错，演员也选得蛮好，没有一个熟人更容易进入这个故事。
3.5 《谁是凶手》里的变态摄像师，《猎罪图鉴》里的妙手画师，构成了这部《远山淡影》里的阴影与光亮。复仇女神也好，非艺术家身份的模拟画像师、轴了一辈子的老刑警也罢，都没能战胜时间。风过留痕，严华成了别人，忘了自己，是苦；落叶无声，画笔依旧，蘸足血泪，是孤。过去，从未淡化，只是那个“我”没了往日的身形。《远山淡影》的内容够丰富，画面也带着一丝倦怠的诗意，可惜影片仍旧是一部为了反转而反转的作品，若能再留些镜头深挖几个女性角色的内心，该多好。
节奏和意境都很不错，演员也选得蛮好，没有一个熟人更容易进入这个故事。
我呸！！！！
很一般，看的昏昏欲睡，日本的混混只会装逼吗，咋咋呼呼喊打喊杀，一抬手各个都是战五渣，人站面前开枪打不中，开枪前先大喊一声提醒对方，难怪那个反派能混的那么大呢，在这群人堆里想混不出头都难，这片里除了那个反派老大，别的黑帮混混放到中国北方二十年前的学校斗殴里都没有赢的份儿
作为一个只拍过两部电影导演，已算控制得还可以了，虽然滤镜把画面压得有点暗，效果好的画面又残留CG感
续作，没了大上警探，小鲜肉独力难撑啊，长得太清秀了还是不太适合演黑白通吃的角色，相较之下反派男二就太出彩了，狂、狠、毒、黑，入木三分啊！
无限接近5⭐
这一部把黑社会都演成傻子了 不明不白上林就上位了 不知道怎么演的 和第一部差太多
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
