Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
刚刚看完 对于一个网大来说 还是不错的 小人物 大事件 大家都没退路 动机居然是工作 真的挺现实的 动作戏诚意十足 而且这个武器样式GET到了我的点
不正经就不正经，不需要一点装正经才是好不正经。韩孝周又黑又脏的飒海王比白白净净时更美，被她的剧照吸引来的。拳打加勒比，脚踢铁达尼，够疯够蠢的爽片挺适合我～
把船从漩涡里整出来也只是基操而已
近年来不可多得的武侠片，算小成本制作的良心之作！
我觉得李光洙也就这样了，每个角色都很李光洙
，强行凑系列的圈钱电影一样
演员们的表现也很不错，真诚且认真，不会让人出戏，比那些老演连续剧的顶流明星强得多了。第一次觉得网络电影的质量也可以这么好的
韩孝周与孙艺珍一样同属气质型的女演员，但其古装扮相稍逊于后者，而且并不适合大浓妆。
海盗系列，最爱看。不过有说有海贼王路飞影子，我不知道，毕竟没看过海贼王。但至少看过加勒比海盗，只能说这个影片差远了。
江湖本就朴素，有人的地方就有江湖！正是因为形形色色的人才是江湖之本质！喜欢这部质朴的作品希望能够发光发亮！
影片和《加勒比海盗》绝对不可比，不是一个段位的。
非常好看，最近难得的好电影。不知道为什么评分这么低。都是专业人士评分么
演员很卖力了，造型也不错，可惜剧情逻辑硬伤，当无厘头喜剧又有点拖沓。
韩孝珠是韩国少有我可以不关心成片质量，只为了看这盛世美颜就能坚持看完各种烂剧烂电影的，哪怕《海盗》第一部的孙艺珍都不行。这个和第一部好像真没什么关系，甚至更烂，，这么好的题材和演员阵容，却跟闹着玩似的，看了一出过家家的爆米花，原来春节档也不只是中国才这样。其实看到演员表有李光洙就该心中有数了，真是综艺人设代入各种电影。
虽然剧情简单，但是在动作上却是十分行云流水。
【先说喜欢的】
浪費了演員和美術道具，有這麼好的陣容卻忽視了故事的重要性。這種低趣味的電影，總是能引起話題，不知道是電影人的悲哀還是觀眾的悲哀。
6.5分。挺热闹的喜剧冒险，韩孝珠又美又颯，李光洙和男主负责搞笑。故事乱且逻辑有硬伤，但冒险程度不亚于加勒比海盗，特效也过关，搞笑程度绝对属于顶级的，哈哈，绝对是部优秀的喜剧！跟第一部一样好看的爆米花电影。
大漠孤烟，夕阳残照，拍摄出的景色很美，在绝美中突出了凄凉的意境。 燃起我心中的武侠情结，喜欢武侠剧的亲不要错过~
故事俗套，中间的转场有点跳脱；感觉剪辑有些问题。两个女主还不错，女二最可爱。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
