Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
一部很稳的住的爱情喜剧，是正统电影的节奏质感，又有网络电影的趣味性，好看的！
驱魔的电影看过不少，此片却是从反面来叙述驱魔仪式。导演似乎如剧中神父一样未想明白，因此一直在摇摆，逻辑上亦有些混乱。彼得神父罪孽很大，不仅在十八年前驱魔时所犯下的重罪，还在于他内心对于信仰的一直不坚定，作为神父竟然不忏悔内心之恶，隐藏着难以言说的秘密。他只能靠行小恩惠来赎罪，因此很难得到神的原谅，最后只能与恶魔做交易。电影构思还是不错的，影像还行，不过叙事太过啰嗦了。
本以为是蹭剧的热度，没想到真香。就喜欢吉吉国王这种废柴般的幽默～
反讽？这么简单的剧情拍得这么长也是难为导演，但是结局上帝离开才救了女人和孩子们也是真讽刺...
最终男主为了孩子们还是与魔鬼做了交易，出卖灵魂
不错不错！延续了第一季的笑点！期待第二季赶紧来
什么烂惊悚片。
七夕还蛮适合看这部片子的，和男朋友看完，一起讨论了一下，感觉四星半有了，半星扣在有些画面看着不够高级。
希望吉祥物能在《赘婿2》中大放异彩，争取成为奥运会吉祥物🤣
无聊的时候看的，轻松点，没什么压力。回忆起了年初追赘婿的时候，也是开心的时光，这种剧也不需要啥脑子，有些亮点还是让人会心一笑的
我已经看完了，真的巨好看。吉吉国王急抢婚那段，我都要笑哭了 😂
不行的苏文兴逆袭了，哈哈，太搞笑了
意料之外的好看！原以为会和其他网剧一样没法看，但真的好看，赘婿制作团队确实很良心，能看出来编剧用心了，知道我们喜欢看做生意那些桥段所以丰满了这一部分来做这部电影，而且结尾那一段确实很精彩，没有结尾那一段的话可能只打4星了。还有不足就是电影真的不够看啊，故事也没法讲的很清楚，少了点惊心动魄的桥段，如果拍成十几集的短剧来丰满就很棒了！还有演员的演技也很在线，大马猴绝了！厉害
还行，稳住等番的客群 还圈了点钱，好点子！但剧情水了！
还是那个味，就是感觉大舅哥不是那个大舅哥了（只看过剧版）
赘婿的编剧肯定是8G冲浪选手吧，居然真的以吉吉国王的名义给苏文兴拍了特别篇电影！不过，木有宁毅和檀儿的番外不是好的赘婿哦！但是看到彩蛋居然说敬请期待第二季我又满血复活了！期待武都篇！
还是蛮搞笑的。就是男主这脸不行，不像一号啊。。。好尬
“邪恶之人必不能继承上帝的王国，他们将继承人间。”
赘婿番外，还不错吧；买几个橘子的梗哈哈哈朱自清的《背影》；又吃女性独立话题…没啥新意，迎合市场？
看过电视剧《赘婿》，比较有意思，正在看小说，这次又出了这个番外，非常有意思的，很轻松的电影，全为了一乐。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
