Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
还是Léna的故事，Elena的文字，和文学一样的节奏，一样的演员想象，不矫情、不戏剧、每一个动作和眼神都直击神经的日常，很迷人。
四星半。非常非常惊艳以及直达内心。为什么我一直说我不要小孩。because I am an unnatural mother。”I left my daughters for three years.” “How did it feel?” “It felt amazing.” 作者选择的削水果皮的意象简直是惊人的sharp obversation。我成长中的很多事情都忘记了，但是我让我妈削水果不要削断皮的记忆一直都刻在脑子里。同看的男同学的感想是: Dakota Johnson’s hot。I want to have gyros for dinner tomorrow。。。
想到了《The Hours》,可能可以拍的更意识流一些，在回忆和现在找到更多微妙的平衡。第一次当导演已经处理的很不错了。没人是天然的母亲。在拥有孩子时的兴奋和离开孩子的兴奋都是一样实在的，因为人实在太复杂了。在拿到第一个娃娃的兴奋会被第二个娃娃取代，而你又会迷上更多的东西。这个社会每一个人都告诉女性要成为母亲，但是对自己失去掌控的恐慌如何克服？很喜欢这种断断续续回忆的感觉，然后某一刻所有的思绪都涌来，无力眩晕然后自然而然回归平静。
还是Léna的故事，Elena的文字，和文学一样的节奏，一样的演员想象，不矫情、不戏剧、每一个动作和眼神都直击神经的日常，很迷人。
Olivia女神！服裝不知道是不是她自己的，每一套都很好看，貼合本人/ Alba Rohrwacher怎麼腫得跟氣球一樣/ 期待Maggie Gyllenhaal更多導演作品！/Maggie選角：跟老公Peter Sarsgaard做愛時說“誒，你活兒不錯，要不要在我電影裡演？”於是教授誕生> 0 <
6.5，整体看下来很难受，我以为会这么持续到最后，但是她女儿和她的关系还行我是没想到的……
子女就像连成一条线的脐橙皮，散发着清香的小蛇，缠绕、箍紧...
坞有才女！好几个镜头可以感受到身体的抽搐和心灵的痉挛！
回忆里Leda自己的经历与当下Nina所遭遇的情况没有形成更强有力的力量，实际上Leda偷走娃娃也强迫性的让Nina与女儿共同经历了她失去大女儿的痛苦。
《小时代》版的《追忆似水年华》；好演员不一定是好导演；如果才华尴尬，千万不要随意尝试氛围；女性主义电影快被平庸的本质和矫揉造作的氛围感给玩死了。
关于女人一生的惊悚片。女性不是天然的母亲，为母则刚的谎言谁来戳穿？我想离开家庭，我想再次获得性快感，我想让孩子们闭嘴不要吵闹，我想不挪位子的晒太阳，我想安静地看一场电影，我想要玩具我想恶作剧……我为这一切买过单了，可这个世界仍旧到处充满敌意。送给“女儿”的发簪最终刺进她身体里，让她逃出这个表面光鲜底部腐坏的果盘，和那点相对柔和的削橙子记忆。阵雨里收留背包客的那段，年轻女主和Alba太有化学反应了，两个人过下去不好吗……
是那种“明线、暗线和更暗线”交织在一起的片子，片名lost daugter其实指的是说出“小时候我也有一个娃娃”的那位（不直接剧透了）……同时也是那种没什么成型故事、靠人物本身来推动剧情吸引观众的片子，玛吉转型导演很惊艳，但还带着演员视角，这种片子真的不能拍太长，演员表演支撑不动冗余时长，举例来说达科特对着女主角抛空洞媚眼的特写镜头也太多了……
她好像终于原谅了自己。可当时如果不逃离那个环境，就再没机会拥有自己的人生了。
所有的想法就非得都塞满这120分钟吗玛吉姐？以后是不拍电影了还是怎样。看得累死
母亲不是天生的，有的人做了母亲也不一定就可以做好母亲。科尔曼表演出神入化。
怎么说呢，都是最平常的日子，虽然淘气却可爱的女儿，可是却是无法忍受的伤痛。女孩子没有被教育人生有多艰难，她们要背负的是什么，为家庭牺牲人生，她们只被教育爱情的美好和成为母亲的伟大。镜头的冲击让最平凡的场景变得尖锐，像一把锥子扎进女主的心里。有些女孩在年轻的时候被情话哄骗然后懵懵懂懂中自我安慰，还有些女孩终于在煎熬半生后后知后觉。那些伤痛不会离去，社会不会改变，也无人理解和倾诉，最后不过是茕茕孑立。今年奥斯卡的女权电影都太有质量了。
自私和爱女情感的撕扯，穿插叙事，不落俗套。这样的女性塑造才叫立体，应该提名本届奥斯卡最佳影片。
这部电影的镜头语言不太流畅。导演的特色是大特写的运用，确实有颠倒黑白之力，但我不甚喜欢。
很压抑的片子，在希腊本该阳光明媚的海滩上，却有着一个悲伤的故事。女主有自己的事业，想要追求学术，可两个女儿的存在却抑制了她的追求，吵闹捣乱，就像今天在窗外的这些熊孩子，让人心烦意乱，无心做任何事情。女主选择了离家出走，这是一个大胆的选择，抛弃了孩子，从传统视角看放弃母职简直离经叛道，这个选择是正确的吗？显然她也不知道，在海滩上，看着年轻的米娜她就像看到了自己，同样拿孩子一筹莫展，同样在他处寻求解脱（科尔曼和米娜情人的暧昧也是类似关系的投射）。女主走不出了，她固然曾经得到过她想要的，可也背负着沉重的负担，对孩子的爱阻碍了她寻找真的自己，可她又无法彻底和她们切断关系，lost的是女儿，也是她自己。为什么女性就一定要背负这种压力，男性似乎就可以潇洒的离开，还是那句话，没有想好就不要生孩子。
其实可以再剪掉十几分钟，作为处女座，很不错了，看完就一个感受，一个女性一旦成为母亲，身上就被套了永久的枷锁，达妹这个角色感觉处理的不是特别好。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
