Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
mark一下，四岁儿子第一次进电影院，全程专注，电影挺棒的，情节紧扣笑点颇多，不过一小时后他说不想看了就离场了，回家后问他，说是看累了。
个人观感：阿方索·卡隆《罗马 Roma》＞肯尼思·布拉纳《贝尔法斯特 Belfast》。—— 尽管影片的故事不够吸引我，但摄影、剪辑、表演、声效、配乐等制作方面倒是让我觉得挺不错的。
😅我当时还想为什么塞尔维亚电影要说英文，是他者视角吗？看完开头才想起来了人家那是贝尔格莱德……
挺不错的，装备大更新，酷炫起来了，还加了个新队员，也挺讨喜。不过强行让阿奇自闭再自我治愈这种剧情真的挺烦
从开场城市宣传片一样的PPT开始就可以感受到导演的平庸，黑白画面的使用似乎是在掩盖棚景的胶感，时而使用儿童视角时而脱离，非常杂乱琐碎，想到哪拍到哪。用了北爱的历史冲突和家庭的经济状况做为背景，但就只拍了表面的冲突与状况，完全没有其他更深或者更多的交代，所有的沉重都被淋上了糖水，苦难与歌唱是割裂的，让人无所适从导演的表达，治愈吗？这真是导演的私人记忆与感情，旁人很难共鸣。Judi Dench贡献了全片最感人的表演，她的眼神为本片增加了许多层次。我个人不太喜欢小演员的表演。
2022年1月30日，第一次带小孩去看的，纪念一下我儿子后面睡觉关灯每次叫我讲一遍，他知道情节，印象深刻。
彩色的电影印象，黑白的回忆点滴，杂乱不章，风格杂糅，上一秒还恣情欢笑，下一秒就悲伤难捱，回不去的故乡与回不去的童年。第一次在电影院看到(多次)泣不成声，爵爷Branagh的半自传电影还真是泪点满满啊，更满的是对Belfast的爱。PS 奥妙yyds
我们每每看欧美电影讲他们的“苦日子”时都会心想，就这？你们也好意思叫苦日子？
个人观感：阿方索·卡隆《罗马 Roma》＞肯尼思·布拉纳《贝尔法斯特 Belfast》。—— 尽管影片的故事不够吸引我，但摄影、剪辑、表演、声效、配乐等制作方面倒是让我觉得挺不错的。
还不错，看出来制作下成本了，很精细。亚当唱的配乐很棒。
究极无语，说什么低龄动画，狗说话就看不下去？谁才是低龄啊你也不想想，照这么说市面上绝大多数片子都是低龄离谱设定，一千年前的古人都比你有创新精神
感觉现在导演也不把小孩当小孩，植入很多新技术，很多新科技到电影里
多说一句，这个电影居然能拿奥斯卡7提我真的有无语到…如果能拿最佳影片我可能这辈子都不相信奥斯卡了。
也也也也也是陪娃看的~汪汪队的车比动画片里的更炫酷，喜欢阿奇的勇敢，还有个新成员贝贝
肯尼思·布拉纳拍这么多年电影还是没什么长进，这片儿之前吹得太狠了
你知道你是誰對吧？你是貝爾法斯特15號的巴弟。
很好看，装备，车，都比电视上好很多，最后结局还收了新的队员贝贝，孩子看完还想看
既是导演的童年往事，也是导演的故乡回忆。记忆中的场景每一幕都被精心设计，同时也塞满了真情实感，但片子整体在同类型中还是不算出挑，故事离我们太远，无法共情和信服。好在朱迪丹奇的表演在结尾起了力挽狂澜的作用，让结尾的三句话也格外共情。
很精炼的回忆体；表达的直白并不是缺陷，而是一种成年作者以自己好莱坞的特性对过往的再组与充足，很近一部来说之对于作品自我印记的进一步加深。虽然对于这种风格并不偏好，但那条小小的爱情线仍然充满了令人向往的童真与纯洁
mark一下，四岁儿子第一次进电影院，全程专注，电影挺棒的，情节紧扣笑点颇多，不过一小时后他说不想看了就离场了，回家后问他，说是看累了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
