James Benning’s first film called The United States of America was a 1975 trip across the country, capturing its scenery through a car windshield. This second one also crisscrosses the nation, but without a car, carving it up instead into a series of static shots of just under two minutes, one for each state, presented alphabetically, from Heron Bay, Alabama to Kelly, Wyoming. The names of the places are nondescript, but the images attached to them are anything but, immaculately composed shots of landscape, cityscape and the spaces in between. As we move from A to Z, the images coalesce into a portrait of today’s USA, tracing out its fault lines almost in passing: fenced-off facilities, a river bed running dry, factories and refineries, run-down streets and gas stations, a camp under a bridge. The past is there too, seeping up through the songs and speeches that sporadically pierce the background noise or the motifs that evoke a whole career; the clouds, trains and cabins are stand-ins for films, not just states. As always, there’s time for more abstract thoughts too: each image may stand for a state, but representativity is slippery. Which state is more cinematic than the rest?
有钱人，一个娃是万万不够的，一旦死了，钱都白瞎了。智叔到底还有多少戏没有播？只要有你，自带加一星。
还蛮讨厌这种解决方式（骗人才能达到的司法公正）。
律师是要争取当事人的最大利益，还是尊重当事人意愿。
方中信廖启智的表演还是很到位的。
过程粗暴的不行，最后挽救了一点。
凶案本身不明不白的，死者这种身份经历的女性会当公子哥的小三?或是电影背景介绍不够，一字未提正氏。是否强奸从尸检检不出来吗?其它剧情就看律师玩游戏了。
太过理想的反博一击，顺利制服富家子，匡扶正义。
廖启智和曾江在船上的对手戏好爽！
就这片子的呈现的香港法律环境，香港能好就怪了。而就这片子网大一样的制作水平，港片能复兴也就怪了
法庭戲太弱了，漏洞也多，應該打電話處理的事非要留下語音信息，一個不誠實證人讓案件早早失去懸念，導致兩位律師立場轉變生硬。
哪里会有绝对的正义，最后一段陈词，就当是理想主义的自白。朋友多了路好走。
法律题材居然拍的如此弱智，这个题材在国内还是吃不开……
2019年亚洲电影节的“技术原因”，捱到现在才终见天日；感觉若非廖启智和“扫黑”大潮，也是困难。立项时对四位主演争锋斗戏的预期，被淹没为一个有些轻佻简陋的律政剧“单集案件”；其实完全可以说，这是《律政强人》“Kent”与“KC”的后续吧。
看到方便面头型就不舒服，更何况是TVB都不会用的老套剧情。据说是廖启智的遗作，加一⭐。
少数几部开3倍速的电影，情节毫无悬念，人物转变生硬，编剧水平很稚嫩
甘草配角真的很亮眼，鲍起静为孙求情、廖启智眼下肌肉的颤动，加了1星，剧情本身2-3星。无论贫穷富有，最重要是人走到终点时，无愧于心。
少数几部开3倍速的电影，情节毫无悬念，人物转变生硬，编剧水平很稚嫩
自首的太生硬了，不过可能却很真实。剧本整体比较平。
电影描述的是理想的世界，不是现实的世界。另外全靠戏骨们撑起的剧，年轻的演员们不行啊。
方中信还是那么帅！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
