剧情介绍

  Set to broadcast in two one-hour films, this family treat is inspired by the classic books of Barbara Euphan Todd and is pegged to be the TV event of the season. Mackenzie Crook has taken Scatterbrook farm and the infamous characters of this well-loved tale and injected them with a tender and authentic charm. This is the perfect family adventure, packed with a fun, mischievous spirit and delivered with an environmental message.
  Mackenzie Crook, (Pirates Of The Caribbean, Detectorists) who has written, directed and stars as Worzel Gummidge, has gathered a host of both accomplished and brilliant actors who are set to appear in this eagerly anticipated adaptation.
  Playing The Green Man, creator of the scarecrows, who arrives to Scatterbrook in episode two, is comedy legend Sir Michael Palin. He says: “It’s a lovely part for me, but the whole script is very memorable and touching, and very funny too. It quite skillfully weaves in something for everybody all the time.”
  Zoë Wanamaker (My Family, Harry Potter And The Philosophers Stone) will play the eccentric local aristocrat, Lady Bloomsbury Barton in episode two. She says: “The whole thing is so charming and inventive. It’s the sort of thing I’d watch. I’m sure it will be a huge success. I know it will - it’s divine.”
  Vicki Pepperdine (Getting On, The Windsors) takes on the role of the formidable Aunt Sally in episode one. She says: “There’s something for everybody. It’s got this heart to it, and you’d be hard pushed as an adult not to engage with it.”
  Steve Pemberton (League Of Gentleman, Benidorm) will play Mr Braithwaite, the farmer. He says: “This is the kind of show the whole family can enjoy together. It has a lot of humour, a lot of visual humour too, and I think kids will enjoy watching the children being central to the story.”
  Rosie Cavaliero (Gentleman Jack, Cleaning Up) will play Mrs Braithwaite, she added: “It’s a story about the imagination, and children escaping into this different world. Mackenzie’s version is totally contemporary.”
  Ones to watch India Brown (Hetty Feather) and Thierry Wickens (making his TV debut) will play Susan and John, two city children spending their summer at Scatterbrook farm who quickly befriend Worzel and begin a summer of adventures.
  The first episode, The Scarecrow Of Scatterbrook, sees two young strangers arrive in the village of Scatterbrook. It’s not long before Susan and John encounter Worzel Gummidge, the Scarecrow of Ten Acre Field. Their world is sent spinning into confusion when they realise Gummidge comes to life. The only person more shocked is Worzel, when he discovers that the children are not in fact fellow scarecrows but humans.
  Their worlds should never commune but fate has conspired to create an extraordinary union. The seasons have stopped and the harvest hasn’t arrived. The rhythm of the natural world is out of kilter and this unlikely trio must try to put it right. Magic, mystery and mayhem unfurl.
  The second episode, The Green Man, welcomes another mysterious arrival to Scatterbrook. The Green Man is the creator of scarecrows and keeper of scarecrow lore. He isn’t at all happy that Worzel is consorting with humans. Elsewhere, local aristocrat Lady Bloomsbury Barton is holding a fete, with a Scarecrow competition that Worzel is determined to win. What will The Green Man and Worzel's most competitive rival, Soggy Bogart make of it all?
  Worzel Gummidge is written and directed by Mackenzie Crook and is a Leopard Pictures, Treasure Trove Productions and Lola Entertainment production for BBC One. It is Executive Produced by Kristian Smith for Leopard Pictures, Lisa Thomas for Lola Entertainment, Mackenzie Crook for Treasure Trove Productions, with rights holders Patrick D. Pidgeon and Eric S. Rollman executive producers for Pidgeon Entertainment, Inc. It is produced by Georgie Fallon and Alex Moody is the Commissioning Editor for the BBC.
  Further casting:
  Francesca Mills - Earthy Mangold
  Tim Plester - Clarty
  Colin Michael Carmichael - Soggy Bogart
  Andrew James Spooner - Flat Alistair
  Phil Hulford - Hannah Harrow
  Tom Meeten - HMS Odney
  Christopher-Robert Barlow - Rag Bag
  Kiran Shah - Chopper and Root Bound
  Charlie Mayhew - Rustle Sprouter
  Lucy Montgomery - Jackie Pudding
  Gus Brown - Oswald Pollypop
  Malik Ibheis - Trike
  Ben Langley - Driver
  Mariam Haque - Receptionist

评论:

  • 劳俊明 5小时前 :

    结局正为娟和麦分手掉眼泪,以为四年的感情分手后肯定会后悔 复合,但直到结尾,也没有任何复合的迹象。结局 山音麦看见全景地图里 五年前自己和娟并肩走的样子,没有哭 只是惊喜的大笑,他大概率已经释然了。电影结束了,只剩下我一个人 一脸呆滞,三次提起结婚,最后还是各奔东西,可能只是因为不再合拍了吧。爱情不能只靠合拍维持,现在想想“我想和你一起浪费时间”果然是顶级的浪漫

  • 振龙 7小时前 :

    以爱情为外壳,展现了日本这几年时代的变迁,就业的残酷,以及大学的恋人如何过渡到进入职场。这部片男女主早期爱好是如此相似,就像是童话故事中的男女主一样。可是随着时间的流逝,激情退去,两个人的毛病也展现给对方,互相也会变的不耐烦。有了工作之后,生活的重心发生了改变。最后的结局竟然没有在摩天轮上说分手,而是回到餐厅。最后碰见了那对儿小情侣有点过于虚幻。最后依然同居好好搬家,没有大悲大吵大闹,我很喜欢这段情节的布置。最后的久别重逢没有互相打扰,含蓄内敛。看完这部电影我怕了,我怕我会随着时间而改变,也怕未来的我是我自己不喜欢的样子。这部片的真实,大于里面的爱情。

  • 弭明艳 0小时前 :

    当书签的电影票,跟你翻版的书架,自助信号灯下的吻,慢慢都会变成停在卓拉领地的塞尔达和看不进去的漫画。《花束般的恋爱》太典型了,因为太清楚我们相爱的模样了,所以不能骗自己继续做一对平凡的夫妇,时隔六年能留下第二个奇迹也挺不错。

  • 剑晨轩 1小时前 :

    我们为什么会走散…说好不走散的

  • 冬漫 9小时前 :

    堆砌二人爱好共同点反而反衬出了这一关系的吹弹可破,但这其实还远远不能算对本片刻意之批判所囊括的地方,两人的独白无处不充斥着格言的滥用,欣喜的时候想调动全世界来配合角色,低潮的时候又恨不得拉拢上所有环境的元素,大到引发事件冲突,小到去费心修饰一本书,二种状态正是物极必反,完全没有对话交流的可能。到最后还如此直白地请路人去重叠他们往昔的面貌,还在刻意去追求一种对仗工整,何尝不是一种原地踏步,无法坦然面对二人关系的缺憾和对终点的逃避?

  • 冒易槐 0小时前 :

    年轻豆友之间的爱情,细节不出所料地丰满,看得窝心感慨。男主拥抱成功学的转变太快太极端,但状态描绘得很准确,和他的出身背景强相关。书影音是一种消费主义标签,消费什么不能决定你是怎样的人;无法长久的永恒原因是步调不一致。

  • 保书白 3小时前 :

    坂元想说的大概不是豆瓣友邻的恋爱不行,而是所有的恋爱就是花束般总会凋谢,就算你俩是豆瓣友邻也不行(以及即便如此,恋爱还是像花儿一样

  • 强俊 5小时前 :

    這……相對於這麼宏大的命題,實在太單薄了。翡翠白玉羹去掉那濃稠的味精芡,本來可以是鍋挺好的白菜豆腐湯的。不是本樂盲想把爵士抬得多高,但說起人生看開就上爵士,是不是有點太糊弄。再扣一星。

  • 偶妍歌 7小时前 :

    一直认为灵魂伴侣是非常稀缺的物种,觉得电影一开始的“不约而同”太不真实。但看到后面感情分叉的情节还是不禁感叹“这就是生活”。

  • 代玮奇 7小时前 :

    不由得想到穆旦这句诗,“相同和相同溶为怠倦,在差别间又凝固着陌生。”

  • 巫忆彤 1小时前 :

    皮克斯的巅峰在coco,高山仰止,可能还有好几年都要生活在coco的阴影中了。期待下一部佳作。

  • 初珠 2小时前 :

    看完以后全场人在鼓掌,真的好好看。开始意味着结束,世界上最稳定的关系依旧是 没有关系。

  • 刀韶阳 0小时前 :

    感情是怎么消失的?感情没有消失,感情只是被其他东西盖住了。只不过这些东西太重,重到抬起它们,也没有力气再继续这段感情了。

  • 愈令暎 9小时前 :

    片子嘛,太工整了,缺了点意思。

  • 仲小凝 9小时前 :

    感情是怎么消失的?感情没有消失,感情只是被其他东西盖住了。只不过这些东西太重,重到抬起它们,也没有力气再继续这段感情了。

  • 嘉勇 1小时前 :

    前半部分完全是坂元特色的时代误植了。到底是谁毁了文艺青年的爱情,还是说爱情本就是文艺消费品所编织的幻梦...

  • 丛鹏云 3小时前 :

    一贯发光发热的金句与小细节让渡于追求普遍共情的大框架,角色们的成长与转变过于俗套反而失去了坂元剧本那种怪招频出的惊喜(特别是最后引入的一组与主角两人相对照的年轻情侣更是一大狗血败笔)。或许坂元裕二的风格就是要靠无聊的对话与细节,用十几集日剧的体量慢慢熬才能看出味道。另外我讨厌的一点是:无论是甜蜜也好受挫也好,一切都太干净了,缺少了在坂元很多故事里都体现出的危险元素,这样的故事只能沦为安慰剂而已。不过倒是也符合一种“文艺青年”的实相。

  • 慈丹秋 1小时前 :

    开头有多甜,中间就有多苦,结尾就有多酸涩~人不是因为喜欢相同的东西才喜欢上彼此的,而是因为注定就会喜欢上对方的两个人,会通过各自喜爱之物发现彼此而已~本片另一个重要启示在于结婚率的降低,很大程度源于女性自主意识的觉醒,比起结婚,她们现在更想要的是幸福。

  • 嘉辰 5小时前 :

    但这没有错对,人都是会变的,你爱的对方永远都是现在的他和过去的他的组合,没有未来。

  • 卫泓 8小时前 :

    眼见他俩好上了,眼见他俩分手了;眼见他俩志趣相投,眼见他俩同床异梦;眼见他俩无话不说,眼见他俩无话可说;眼见他俩穿着情侣鞋,眼见他俩的鞋不再同款;眼见他俩成为令别人羡慕的恋人,眼见别的恋人成为他们羡慕的对象····唉,有情人不能成眷属总是令人悲伤的!

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved