Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
好难得见美式青春这么正常的主角团了……（相对）
战狼style的中式英雄主义无数次错愕尴尬到脚趾头抓地能抠出三室一厅。就连之前吹嘘流浪地球的特效班底片尾看完字幕还是棒子设计的…陈数在片中尴尬的说到：西方信仰诺亚方舟，而我们要精卫填海和愚公移山。这个时代或许需要英雄，但求别忘了，自high可以，共鸣是需要建立在“谦虚”的基础之上，而共情也不是靠孩子唱歌发下一生相伴的爱情毒誓来赚取廉价的眼泪的。
尴尬到抠脚，事关十几万人性命的事情，最后安炸药只有两个本不应该干这事的人干。请问其他人是死绝了么，你们就算人送不上去，给他们补补装备也行吧，真看着他们徒手爬啊。
倒是被陈数感动到了
场景做得逼真，其实故事阐述也不错，有爱与成长，舍家为国的奉献精神，值得一看
真的难看 演员演技没问题 台词设计有点问题 特效有些问题 剪辑很大问题 配乐全是问题
蛮……尬的，我们一家第一次一起看了个……这个电影
6.5分水平，4分给大场面，那些悬崖峭壁光是看已经让我头晕了，其他的都get不到。剧情，台词尤其尴尬。学习了电影套路之后很容易联想与解构，ps：虽然场面够灾难，可是朱一龙山路十八弯开车撞各种障碍物还连人带车旋转空翻最后还精神棒棒那段，我都看笑了
只能说营销太厉害我被成功骗到电影院 ，灾难片 又像科幻片 ，你说他是科幻片吧 他又是灾难片 。太烂了 ，不值得买票去电影院 看。
剧情差，特效差，强硬的煽情，冗长的父子线，不符合逻辑的个人英雄展示，在电影院看的全程吐槽。一星给陈数和工人，一星给片尾的铁道兵
这电影很炸，前半段把我点燃，后半段引信切断。
最后20分钟忍不住骂骂咧咧🤬🤬🤬各路大神的棺材板都要弹起来了，话说陈数越来越像柳岩和蔡明老师了……
real hardcore，real rock，rock it!
灾难特效还行，毕竟国内技术就那样不过也一直在进步，剧情方面少点煽情行不，突出个人英雄主义真的太烦了，反正主角就是超能威神，智力体力双佳，焦俊艳这个角色很契合，其他人都挺脸谱化的不想评价了。
有点中二，剧情也老套，套着金属皮的典型美式中二青春片。
哎，吹爆！！！太喜欢了！！！搞女人不如搞音乐！搞钱不如搞音乐！搞啥都不苏搞音乐！
小笼包的朋友推荐去看的，哇塞特效太棒了，剧情也十分紧凑，主演演技牛逼啊，朱一龙这是要崛起？应该说是中国灾难大片正式崛起！哈哈哈，强推！
及格分，出发点和立意是好的，但是有很多情节太强行了，不是水到渠成是为演而演，父子情的那部分还有最后父亲做手架的部分我接受无能
想给两星的…想要表达的太多，每一段单拎出来都还不错，但堆砌在一起就很突兀奇怪。父子情，很感人，但前面烘托得那么危急，来哭一出，抱歉缓不过来。爱情，放弃的莫名其妙也突然满血…奇怪，太奇怪了
有段时间没见到这种质量不错的校园轻喜剧了，而且还是摇滚题材，演员颜值也很高啊。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
