Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
看了个鬼片这是？？戴妃是安娜波琳的远房亲戚？？小k太刻意模仿了，显得都有点做作，含胸含肩地走路，瞪着泪汪汪的双眼，在夜里穿着蓬蓬裙走去自己家那里还真有点戴妃的影子，但看着也太恼火了哎呀
《闪灵》般的诡异英伦豪宅，临近崩溃的戴安娜王妃，不断重复残害着自己的躯体，几处梦境与现实的交织，随角色跟进的运动镜头。
全片一直都在说戴安娜怎么疯，怎么崩溃，怎么无法忍受，但是却完全没有说为什么。
把Diana和Anne Boleyn做勾连是一个亮点，我从来没有想过在亨利八世离婚案里，那个被处以叛国罪并被砍头的王后会有什么心路历程。
小K太做作了吧（主要是形体的确是不行。。）？虽然不知道戴妃是不是就那样。。。苏你只要是女仆就要对小姐下手是吧哈哈哈~
AMC Mercado 20 | 喜欢 影院观看沉浸体验极佳 看完了才发现是绿木配乐！小K脑残粉表示全程时装秀+怼脸非常满足 圣诞夜烛光中的母子角色扮演温暖感人
做作的姿态和面部表情，气声凶巴巴的台词，她的糟糕演技支撑不了这个角色，观影每一分钟都很煎熬。看任何版本的戴妃都是喜爱和同情，只有这一版，想伸手进屏幕揪住她的衣领大喝：贱人就是矫情。
虚幻与现实交织就如裙子上的外套一样，唯一让人醒目的是夹克和伤口的血红色；除了男权对女性的压迫，很多的是否是灵魂在时空牢笼中的困境。摄影师这次真的开大了，甚至有点找到打开马利克的方法了
斯特尔特表现太好了！！远超预期，脆弱悲伤怯懦勇敢，角色转变的每个层次都有抓到，依然带有自身的独特气质，却让这个人物还能显的可信自然，这是电影明星的魅力，她与戴安娜最神似之处，就是那种在个人身上挥之不去的叛逆与不适
小k拿影后！（不管怎么样，KFC和羽绒服已经赢了
戴安娜王妃之分手的决心，几乎全程压抑和神经质，即便如此我K的演技还是得到了释放
戴安娜不停抱怨老房子(空气中有维多利亚女王的皮屑...),她就生在宫殿里好吗。
甚至更想看一版Anne Boleyn的电影。
其实我感觉就是借了戴安娜的壳，用了那种反叛与传统的矛盾感，讲的像是黑天鹅里的故事，自残，自杀，臆想，把一个人演到极致，片子很惊悚，但是真的好美，不过那些直白的对比，时刻都在强调的tradition，还有那个结尾实在不太好，不像是传记电影了。
妆发大约是全片最强亮点，小k表演不差，但从剧作而言，这个人物显得太单薄了，全程像一只脆弱的花瓶。
“They want you to survive. As the person you were when you first came here ten years ago.” “And I hope that wild horse was never tamed.”
很多大远景，展现了皇家气派和压抑。镜头总体上以静制动，大部分要不是固定镜头，要不是平缓的拉推。和童年的场域连通的那段环绕镜头在全片特立独行，正如黛安娜在皇家的如坐针毡，然后是一些漂亮的蒙太奇拼接，于是高潮诞生。色彩是一种反抗手段，黛安娜服装的颜色总是与周围格格不入，从服从到尝试反抗到觉醒，颜色从翠绿到薄荷绿到大红，从不协调到对比色，在欢快的色彩中她终于找重新寻到了真我。
the use of jazz is absolutely brilliant
就美术的角度来说，还行，颜色，构图，都很好。发型整的真的很像。
事实上是完成了一次《闪灵》的再造，空洞的大宅、幽灵、梦境与幻象。爵士鼓点与运动长镜思及《鸟人》——相同的焦虑感。沉稳的封闭性空间构图以及在戴安娜的近景与特写镜头中不安分的摄影运动，嵌套的蒙太奇确实加强了阶级与皇室贵族的限制力量，戴安娜强烈的渴望挣脱牢笼的冲动同样在观众这里得到了感受，直至最后我才意识到这是一个发生在90年代的故事。可将问题的解决与自我家族血统的认同相联系的处理方式似乎感觉略微轻浮。最后，克里斯汀的表演始终是没能深入到我的内心。她很卖力了，但遗憾就遗憾在我看出了她的卖力。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
