This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
上一次让我觉得删掉男主一切完美的作品还是小滑冰，只能说老版的精彩程度斯皮尔伯格的牛逼程度和男主的拉垮程度成正比。男主一脸青春期还没结束的表情还有大白嗓和60年代毫无关系，只能说前有埃德加赖特后有斯皮尔伯格，二代爹妈会铺路。
除不时闯入并撕裂剧情的歌舞部分外，所剩的一切都是如此冗长无趣。没看过原版，但这极有可能是最差的一部斯皮尔伯格。
我宣布这是我看过最没CP感的CP。它为什么不好看，谢飞导演说到点子上了：主演明星气质不够，观众的眼睛没办法被他们吸引。除去美国移民话题，于我而言，就是看了又一版罗朱。
还不如让tick tick…boom提名Oscar BP
斯皮尔伯格宝刀不老，对于歌舞片了解不多的我来说，看着还是挺欣赏的，当然参照物不是雨中曲#2022奥斯卡阅片倒计时#
斯式招牌下，技术上当然是一流的，但电影却沿用了很老派的风格和表演，而且这个爱情故事怎么看都像是个发情故事。完全无法接受哥哥尸骨未寒的当夜，就心甘情愿和凶手上了床，还用一首天大地大也没我大的歌告诉丧夫的嫂子，不跟杀他哥那人在一起就活不了。你说这是文化差异还是鬼迷心窍了。
斯皮尔伯格继《大白鲨》《第三类接触》《人工智能》后第n次让我失望，老斯导演的调度能力自然不必多提，只是他的剧本每次的脑残程度都能让我汗颜不止。新版《西区故事》的选角是毁灭性的，我万万没想到我堂堂的里夫成了一个说话声像小鸡崽子尖声细语，还没手下有阳刚之气声音大，真是气死。斯皮尔伯格《西区故事》的选角可媲美张艺谋在《长城》中的选角。
还不如让tick tick…boom提名Oscar BP
又一个技术层面上好莱坞顶级水准的代表，好是确实好但没有打满分的欲望，翻拍永远绕不过的坎就是不符合时代进步的老故事和价值观
斯皮尔伯格继《大白鲨》《第三类接触》《人工智能》后第n次让我失望，老斯导演的调度能力自然不必多提，只是他的剧本每次的脑残程度都能让我汗颜不止。新版《西区故事》的选角是毁灭性的，我万万没想到我堂堂的里夫成了一个说话声像小鸡崽子尖声细语，还没手下有阳刚之气声音大，真是气死。斯皮尔伯格《西区故事》的选角可媲美张艺谋在《长城》中的选角。
歌舞和配角都很棒，哥哥嫂子还有Riff，都展现出了角色的魅力。
翻拍的意义何在？给斯皮尔伯格的调度加一⭐。
没那么难看，只是歌舞剧本身的上限摆在那儿，也很难再突破了。
幼儿园年末汇报演出，名师在线挂名指导。 ps。。。新生代们这几位，真是白瞎这天价资源了
所以2021年了(不是已经2022了)为什么还要来看样板戏？可能也应当是属于当下的，Speilberg想要我们看到炫光产生的地方，倾听未曾被注意的声音(西语)。视线被蒙蔽，听力被破坏，语意被改写。我们努力去倾听，依然无法理解；我们努力去表达，依然言不由衷。
抛开政治正确滤镜，对于导演本人之外毫无意义的一次翻拍——无论在戏剧改编还是电影升级层面。如果斯皮尔伯格或任何创作决策者肯将西语去字幕化的政治嗅觉灵光度拿出一半用在视听上，恐怕也不会呈现各式镜头被60多年前旧作吊打的窘境。
有這麼多錢 拍點什麼別的不好嗎 悶到嘔血 兩個半小時看起來像五個小時 如坐針氈 也不知道當初沒趕上在電影院看是福是禍
看在斯皮尔伯格的份上，多给一颗星吧。歌舞剧如果本身情节不够硬核，还是不要上大荧幕了，留在舞台更好。罗密欧与朱丽叶这对智障小青年已经让人头大，玛丽亚和托尼简直是智障plus。AND男主唱功演技和人品都太差劲了。
所以为什么要期待一个业已成熟的电影工业体系去精准还原好莱坞黄金时代的光影带来的感动呢，引导的方向不大对。Ansel唱歌跳舞还真是都不精通。
很完美所有运镜 光影 走位 歌舞的编排 都是丝毫无差，每个镜头都很精致，但真的全片看下来你会发现毫无感情！一个优秀的音乐剧摆拍壳壳。（男女主选角不可）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
