Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
杀人诛心劲儿大但开篇并没有说清楚为什么顿巴斯要反抗基辅…
真实还原了战争的血腥和残酷，这一点来说是优秀的现代战争佳片。但对于战争的反思，人性的拿捏还是差了点火候。男主一家全被炸死这一段，演技合格，但没爆发出来，全剧都是在这样的压抑和克制里。是合格的了解历史的战争片。
从拍摄的国家来看，显然是对内容有选边站队的选择。但对局外人来说，也能够了解这一敏感地区发生发展的一些脉络和过程，了解事件发生的一些前因后果，也深刻体会到，战争或者局部冲突，都会给人民带来深重的灾难。无论哪个国家，哪个地区，持何种态度，何种观点的，都必须应以和谈协调的角度，来尽量避免武装冲突。
真的很好看这部剧！绝了耶！太绝了！大家快去看！真的很绝！剧情真的很有意思了！
电影里的东乌克兰人痛苦了两个多小时，而现实中他们在地下室里等了普京&俄军八年多。。。
战争的可怕 我只能看出绝望 应该更侧重表现感情吧
没什么重点 属于那种边看边回想往事的电影 虽然没有什么启发但是有一个放空自己的时间也挺好的
先分一些钱给...
旁白娓娓道来理查德·林克莱特的美妙台词，像一部精彩的童年回忆录，我被深深迷住了
抛开政治因素，导演的主观意识形态不谈，虽然剪接不是很好但拍的依然不错，起码拍的比咱们好
还以为有过boyhood了林克莱特就没必要拍这种片了。
怀旧十足尤其是音乐，风格似十多年前黑暗扫描，真人转动画技术更为成熟，光线阴影感更好，动画制作好处多细节更为丰富，减少现实感政治性，对比纪录片一类求实风格
与其说是回到60年代，不如说是让所有人重返童年。房前草坪上无忧无虑地嬉戏，父母职业在伙伴间的攀比，坐在电影院里刷过漫长的夏季，黑白的电视机突然仿佛涂上彩色的画笔，一盘盘精致的食物勾起了满满的食欲。那些可爱的画面里都是曾经的自己。
林克莱特将60年代美国登月梦想的潮流时代意伪纪录片的形式搬上了荧幕。通过小男孩的幻想和真实发生的登月情节相融合，无不凸显着在那个时代，登月梦想和对太空的遐想深入到每一个小镇中的人们。他们是人类在月球留下足迹的见证者，同时又不乏对日常生活的点滴记录，有抠门为省钱想尽办法的父亲，有变着花样为大家做各种美食的母亲，还有打闹争抢玩具的兄弟姐妹，有极具年代感的电影、黑白电视和各种桌游。导演将这些生活点滴融合到太空时代的童年中，颇有共鸣！
看不到新的爱在，只能看下这部将就一下，反正另一部剧上也能看到伊桑霍克。林克莱特的六十年代怀旧片，用这样专绘技术呈现出来观感上倒是蛮新奇的，代入感蛮强的。整体完成度挺高的就是真正的太空部分短了点，childhood部分跟Boyhood比还是差了点，但不影响我喜欢这部，私心给五星
儿童的视角往往是新奇又有趣的，故事的穿插不显突兀，直到最后那句话“12个人和一个儿童到过月球，但从未成功回来”才点醒了我，这是一场梦，一个童话。
感受历史小记忆的大集合，以及现世的满地鸡毛
非常有趣，帮观众回顾了美国上世纪的太空时代，那个最美好的时代。
主要是那年代的美国南部休斯顿的生活比较有意思。
灼热的阳光，都照不出地狱的黑暗，惨白的白昼，却如同在阴间，草地上随风曳动的小花，见过鲜血淋漓的人间
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
