剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 卫晟然 8小时前 :

    看起来像后天的父子情+2012的前妻再婚家庭的综合体。看完我觉得导演媳妇是不是再婚了,已经两部把再婚丈夫拍死了

  • 振龙 3小时前 :

    剧情非常的old了,不仔细逻辑推敲还是挺好看的。

  • 凡辰 0小时前 :

    跟电视剧一样挺没意思,只有点点的搞笑,这部把咸鱼,赶集,互联网,征婚网站,羽绒服等现代理念带到了古代。

  • 司马静枫 0小时前 :

    导演:我采样我自己。扯淡的一批不过爽就完事了。哈利贝瑞怎么跟b局越来越像了 plummer长发神颜

  • 惠寒 0小时前 :

    that's priceless sci-fi for me.

  • 公孙听枫 3小时前 :

    额,设定还是有点。。扯了吧。。视觉效果还是蛮好的~ 好久没见过哈莉贝瑞啦,曾经的暴风女好怀念啊~~ AI设定其实过于扯淡了。。。都特娘的星际殖民了,居然被自己的AI干掉了。。你说可笑不可笑??不要拿现在的认知去揣测未来的人嘛。。

  • 夏侯夏璇 5小时前 :

    虽然单从故事来看是挺一般的,但是简简单单的故事里流露出来的各类细节可以为本片加分。

  • 坤星 1小时前 :

    可能看这部电影前,看到太多对这部电影的负面评价,放低了期待值。看完后感觉没那么好,也没那么差,就一部标准的好莱坞灾难片。

  • 塔采春 7小时前 :

    感觉感情线写的还蛮爽的,谁不想和貌美大小姐谈恋爱呢?尤其女主还这么漂亮,这个感情线还挺带感。

  • 卫丽丽 2小时前 :

    像是用《后天》和《2012》废弃素材混剪,再加点无脑设定攒出来的上世纪过气科幻片,还是伪大制作,进入月球内部的反转不叫开脑洞,而是想不出来胡诌的强转折,莫名其妙的地球追车戏,莫名其妙的于文文,各种忽略逻辑与细节的设计,艾默里奇拿手绝活搞成这样,华谊究竟是从中作了什么弥天大烂梗?

  • 史英彦 9小时前 :

    既不是灾难片,又不是科幻片。节奏上像是PPT的highlights 快进展示。

  • 卫绵升 2小时前 :

    各种常见的有关月球的阴谋论,多线叙事,剧情节奏紧凑,大场面壮观,其实还挺不错

  • 孝彤云 3小时前 :

    高阶版人类被AI摧毁,而AI被低阶版人类的炸弹炸死。在一个家里带孩子,结果于文文不是哈利贝瑞女朋友……?!

  • 戢易蓉 5小时前 :

    感觉这部电影在跟我说:快去学点天文学知识吧,不然像我这样糊弄你你都发现不了呢

  • 屈刚洁 1小时前 :

    然后套了德国艾灾难片的皮,属于是人文部分完全没学到,商业奇观部分又很敷衍无脑,极其的乱炖

  • 嘉丽 5小时前 :

    看了开头,之后随意快进一会儿完。对二房这类喜剧丑角一路“开挂”以及全盘的现代商业模式没什么兴趣

  • 市鹤轩 9小时前 :

    月球空心和戴森球是在抖音上听到的理论,对月球陨落的恐惧居然来自对人工智能的恐惧。是导演拍过的电影里比较弱的一部。有点乱。但是博士要靠搞卫生做餐厅服务员度日导演你要这么狠毒吗

  • 丘和泽 2小时前 :

    这哪是灾难片,分明是怪兽片……艾默里奇也开始走这种无聊的路子了,全剧几乎只有最后十分钟看着有点意思。

  • 佟野云 9小时前 :

    应该叫《智商陨落》,也只有后20分钟的特效能拿分,其它剧情纯属凑数,千篇一律的文本,假大空和说教齐飞,家庭和亲情成了灾难片的不二标配,前90分钟充斥着偏激的对话和无意义的争执,看腻了类型片穷途末路的一再复制,空泛的太空理论,毫无逻辑的AI分形粒子和祖先创造月球,又一次稀松平常的止损行动,一个扫地的吊打NASA闲饭总局的饭桶们,总之给了个设定在里面任其胡诌,老美总扮演救世英雄的上帝角色,狂妄自大又惺惺作态,还是先救救你们身处水深火热疫情下的子民吧。★★

  • 斯梓莹 6小时前 :

    把《赘婿》第一部中的喜剧元素放大升级:今为古用+神经喜剧。这次没有「耶利哥之墙」,但把「落跑新娘」的桥段拍了,非常《一夜风流》

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved