Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
如果露肉的人再好看一点，情节再生动一点，承先启后的再圆润一点，估计能更好看，我只是觉得难得看到的彩虹圈“姐妹情”的故事，但是光讲姐妹情也确实无聊了很多
糊弄亚裔男同性恋的时候能不能起码走一点点心🤏
虑到Joel Kim Booster和杨伯文本身的喜剧功力，Andrew Ahn在《车道》就早已炮制的出色气质，还有对各种尖锐话题进行漂白粉饰性的回避，仍然感觉像张题材试水的“安全牌”，无意完成本应轻松拿捏的推陈出新。但它依然扎实，并且在骄傲月拉开大幕之时源源不断地释放热闹、活泼的能量；快投身于这个夏季，尽情地爱，真挚地面对自己；在炎热之际，唱布兰妮唱Donna。始终很欢乐，并丝毫不介意这般简单。
前半段是两个丹麦人和一群勇敢狗勾荒野求生（x）（养狗的还是别看了，蓝瘦），后半段是两个终极孤独的人在孤独中，等待了八百多天。
那这种剧本和设定不动脑袋拍电影，这可能才是真的傲慢和偏见。
Conrad Ricamora居然top起来了哈哈哈哈哈哈哈//姐妹帮里总有一个mama bee给大家忙前忙后收拾烂摊子（sigh//整体看下来平平淡淡，就是太多hot body看不过来
如果露肉的人再好看一点，情节再生动一点，承先启后的再圆润一点，估计能更好看，我只是觉得难得看到的彩虹圈“姐妹情”的故事，但是光讲姐妹情也确实无聊了很多
唯一一处正常的地方就是主角认为《以你的名字呼唤我》很无聊
谁看了不说这是同志版的《傲慢与偏见》呀？角色和情节设定直接可以对号入座了。
冰雪世界，看到压抑，好在结局美好。以后有机会要去格陵兰看看。 ps：电影也讽刺米国到处插旗子的恶劣行径！美国，万恶之源！
非常Pride and Prejudice甚至到雷同的地步，结尾很难不联想到糟糕的white savior complex以及romcom都有的俗套桥段。但还是想给五星。They r queer, they r here, get used to it.
Gay版“傲慢与偏见”，莫名带入了身边的朋友，还挺带感。
之前在吉野贤治的书里就听说了fire island，就像LGBT的乌托邦。有生之年一定要去一次，体验一次完完全全做回自我的感觉。
可供记忆的点很少, Will这个角色还不错，Zane太hot了...
画面很香艳，想表达的也很简单。大概是想讲，在如今快餐版同性恋爱盛行的时代，也依然存在真爱，不用为了迎合大家的喜爱而去伪装自己。但是吧，深度还是不够啊，很浅很浅。
很喜欢看根据真人改编的电影，情节或许没爆米花电影那么激动人心 因为真实反倒更有力量。冰面世界风景的迷人没的说了。对抗孤独与幻觉也是很吸引人的一点。幸运的结尾，真实世界的一趟人生冒险，幸存即是胜利
netflix对本片的关键字adventurous&suspenseful，感觉被骗了。
剧情很烂，人物很扁，但觉得will好帅，我是不是坏掉了，草
傲慢与偏见为底色吗哈哈哈
挺轻松的喜剧，就是主角也太丑了哈哈，好几个配角颜值来补救
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
