Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
前半段更好一些，跟后半的衔接有点割裂，全员演技都蛮好，就是看得人很憋屈。
出于职业情怀，给个满星评价吧。
拍得略显松散，但讽刺意味好足，演员也给电影加了很多分
观影过程挺愉快，到2/3处可以打4星；结尾稍弱，看完怅然若失。
对新电影又有信心了！跟佩内洛普·克鲁兹一头红发一样惊艳的还有三位主演的表演，哈哈哈哈
【20220508 & 20220511】竟然二刷。
看的过程心一直揪着，很难过，也很难受，比前些年看《海边的曼彻斯特》还难受，因为这部影片里所有的人都在道歉，都在忏悔，都背负了沉重的枷锁，所有的人都是受害者，所有的人也都在直接间接地加害别人，所有的人都是痛苦的，到底谁才有资格原谅别人？到底谁才应该被原谅？
前方路漫漫，无数选择的当口，坚定内心勇往直前，人生没有彩排，走过的路都是你的勋功章。
观影过程挺愉快，到2/3处可以打4星；结尾稍弱，看完怅然若失。
對電影工業全方位放箭。電影節奏與演員演技都很好。
一场悲剧，但是却在悲剧的后续持续发酵中越来越不清晰这场悲剧的尽头在哪儿？何为道德审判？道德审判又怎么样裹胁着公序良俗？公序良俗过后又是不是会涉及到法律的判断？一切都是在现实社会里值得探讨的公共哲学。片名交待了最后，所有的人似乎，最后都只留下了空白，那段似乎清晰的回忆亦或事实已经不再那么重要了。
极度灰色的电影，还能道歉还能反省的社会总留一线希望。春节期间听修隧道的工作人员讲。工地上的意外死亡事件处理非常快，需要谈的就是钱的数字，死者儿女都不愿意见亡者一面。冷漠到极致。
如导演之前的《犬猿》一样激烈和戏剧冲突不断，结局倒是处理得有几分温柔。希望自己记住这部不太起眼的电影，记住这个固执倔强不肯认错，但其实内心无法原谅自己的父亲。
比想象中更好，古田新太演技太好了。吉田惠辅对生活感的把控越来越老练，完全不迷恋戏剧性冲突，情绪释放从容且克制。父亲恨遍了所有人又原谅了所有人，却始终不能原谅自己：“人都是怎么跟自己和解的呢？”他学女儿画画，看女儿的漫画，却依然对女儿一无所知。本该熟悉却陌生家人，距离最近的一次却是在不同情景下一同观赏海豚云——人本来就无法完全相互了解，但在那一瞬，你我心意相通。
在高效的前十來分鐘四場戲以後，交代了不被理解的女兒與暴躁的父親形象，迅速奠定了基調。但，片名出來以後是要幹嘛？老套的事件寫法，焦點反覆在不同人物之間拉扯，但人物淪為了表現（導演想像中）的日本民族的高度自省與內疚感的工具，而不像「人」，剩下半小時也不想看了。
拍给爱电影的人的电影的电影 三位演员几乎演到可以拿影帝影后的表演级别
从杰出公民以来，两位导演合作的越来越差，笑点包袱创意都挺足的，结果真正涉及到主竞赛才这么一点，坐拥几位大明星，演这个本子是真的吃力不讨好
映画の話に戻ると、ストーリーはとても気に入りだけど、一本の映画としてはどうかなと思う。セリフによる説明が多く、映像の美しさはほとんど見受けられないので、映画じゃなくて小説にしたらいいじゃない？でもやっぱストーリーが良かったので、落ち着いて最後まで楽しむことができた。
玩我！？？真以为得癌症了，我还想发展这么普通，然后…演的好好（鼓掌！立体化讽刺，绞碎奖杯那里我笑的想死Hahhahah
好惨。没一个人好过的。其实特意回去再看了一下女孩没有偷东西啊？会不会是惯偷被剑心制止了呢？但为啥拉进房里又突然跑出来啊？不过应该都是想太多了，其实就是惯犯被拉进房里责备然后害怕逃跑。剑心后面的表现其实就是个老好人。阿姨都喜欢的老好人。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
