-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
7.0 麻麻得，大小威鸡娃史。在处理比赛的影视化呈现时并没有创新和电影性的适应。好在故事本身的流传度和最后开门一刹那不胜之胜的表现力。
此前还觉得是在看洪尚秀的电影，近年来，则愈发觉得我是在阅读洪尚秀本人，这部就更直接了，感觉就是他私人日记里的几页纸，写了他对电影创作的一些理解，对金敏喜的表白。作为观众，你可以觉得这种私密性质拉满的电影很无聊（干脆你拍完只给金敏喜一个人看好了？我为什么要花一个半小时就听你说这点东西？你和她的表白我又不在乎。）你也可以认为这样的电影很甜蜜充满着爱。薄弱或轻盈，见仁见智。而我呢，我是介乎二者之间，反正你拍，我就会看，每年一部已成习惯。我只希望我不会因为这种惯性而失去对你的作品的敏感。
在成功励志与成长温情的主线下，还夹带了种族议题与阶层关切，《国王理查德》虽然没有突破传记片的常规模式，仍不失为一部精彩好看的电影。
小时候上学那会儿，正好赶上威廉姆斯姐妹在网坛崛起。也十分清楚的记得看台上她们的老爹绝不会缺席。大威小威的天赋和勤奋自不必说，但最主要、最重要的可能还是因为老爹的锲而不舍。而本片的主角并不是大小威，而是她们的父亲“国王”理查德。虽然故事很励志，也很传奇，但这样的成功恐怕又很难复制。
真是有远见的爸爸，保证童年的快乐，不耽误学业，才能把技能提高到最高！
大小威和richard选角蛮成功的，史皇总算不演自己了。其实大V这一路都算顺风顺水的，编剧选取的几个时间锚点展现williams低谷都没有引起太大的波澜... 第三幕还是靠体育赛事的魅力本身，同样是励志题材确实不如Coda - 7.4
威尔·史密斯当然实至名归，表演一流。但电影本身还是比较中庸。无非是底层人民通过努力崛起，一举成名。
这剧本能上黑名单？史皇的表演也就那样，看来封帝的情况和老李子一样，没意思。
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.
觉得男主的教育方式真的不咋地，之所以还能成功，完全是因为大小威天赋太逆天了。换句话说，要是大小威没有成功，那他只是一个自以为是的控制狂父亲。
觉得男主的教育方式真的不咋地，之所以还能成功，完全是因为大小威天赋太逆天了。换句话说，要是大小威没有成功，那他只是一个自以为是的控制狂父亲。
真是服了
泛泛一般，除威尔史密斯的霸演之外，乏善可陈。但也算开了眼，好莱坞的政治正确已经过度到了反面。如果主角是白人的话，这绝对是一部种族主义影片。
个人评价：
过誉。这部片什么都想说，但都没说得太深。最后的字幕 也更加说明现世用钱用title堆砌的价值观。我想看到类似这样的字幕：他们如何回到康普顿 在当地建立「威廉姆斯网球学校」之云云。但是没有等到，只有Will 匪夷所思的slap。
(2021 145min)
影片并未将重点放在威廉姆斯姐妹这两位伟大的运动员身上，而是挖掘、发现其背后的最大推手——理查德·威廉姆斯。他偏执自负，有浓厚的家父主义作风；他深谋远虑，为了女儿们的长远发展甘愿放弃眼前利益。
演的挺好，但是为什么是个摔跤吧爸爸的叙事呢？
四平八稳的命题作文。还是要恭喜Green。
This is sport. This is great.
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
