Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
片头一栋被轰开的居民楼简直就是乌克兰战场的翻版
弄的神神秘秘的，我还以为对抗的是外星人人呢
剧本差一点，台词抖机灵，和姜子牙有的一拼。国漫现在制作水平一点都不差，就差好故事和好好讲故事了。
在黑暗中的冰面上悄无声息地滑行，有种冷冰冰的浪漫。那一刻，像极了我们的人生，孤身一人，如履薄冰，蜷缩在脆弱的冰面上四顾无人，徒然等待，等待大厦将倾，等待万劫不复。
感觉是逻辑好不通，但滑冰送病毒这个点子有点独特的，整个基调都是萧杀 ，搞了半天要毁掉，也是醉了
熊孩子奇幻大冒险，电影不知道想表达啥价值观。
其实挺应景的 ，战争中没有所谓的绝对正确和绝对错误，这堂现实的公正课里，没有人能给出答案。倒是喜欢这种不撕心裂肺的调子，仔细回味还是有挺多值得说的点。
玩了很多战争游戏，滑冰作战没玩过。惊悚力度不够，剧情立意不深，鸡肋作品。
这部国产动画，也算是借鉴了不少国内电影，周星驰电影的内容还尤其不少。
以劳米拉佩斯为首的溜冰小分队历尽千辛万苦护送病毒罐达到目的地又反手摧毁它，还不惜赔上性命。故事还是那个简单的故事，只不过把场景变成了结冰的海面，故事可看性又加了几分。加上劳米拉佩斯一如即往的能打能挨的硬朗作风，还点缀上温情宠女的母亲形象，还是很能吸引住一大批观众欣赏本片的。
剧情太一般了，感觉队友都没体现价值就死了。
故事一般，全程几乎靠虎墩的意气用事惹祸增添冲突来推动剧情，唯一的笑点在于：前期铺垫黑大王的绝世神功，最后原来是个降智版傀儡“裘千丈”。这个反转确实哭笑不得，外加上气不接下气的一句“这绝对是难得的高手”简直笑出腹肌。
力荐。太硬核了，太撕裂了，太末日了，太绝望了。制作的很精良。
听人入胜的剧情 还有美丽风景 不同场景气氛很到位 这样一部非美国的外文片真的很棒 不知道为啥豆瓣评分这么低？哦 原来都是zb犯的
结尾草草，简直是侮辱观众，白瞎了剧情设定，很多角色单薄的可笑。美术不错，有些镜头很美。
发现被骗的时候电影就可以结束了，不需要拖拖拉拉又二十分钟
氛围挺好。画面也不错，能感受到战争的恐怖、残酷。演员演技在线，尤其主角，演的很棒，能感受到她对女儿的爱。但是，为了女儿就可以牺牲其他人吗？向队友开枪，拼死也要把病毒带回去。当下，俄乌战争还没结束，新冠依然在肆虐。你，为了女儿就要牺牲全人类吗？最后所谓拯救在我看来不过是对欺骗的报复。欧美的价值观、情亲观可见一般，野蛮的民族！
夜幕下滑冰的镜头可以对标边境杀手 别的就基本扯淡了
抹去了背景，从描述战争的角度看，还是一部不错的电影
冰上作战的场景比较少见，最后二人对战十人的攻防片段有看头，距离五十米，即使有狙击手也来不及打，紧张刺激，其它部分没啥好说。北欧的女性很有个性，看起来特别能战斗。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
