Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
毫无诚意的翻拍，编舞平庸、对白无趣又冗长，2021版《西区故事》更像是二流戏剧而非电影。
但凡把套当下议题模板的心思花一半在调度上也不至于糟糕成现在这样，一种摄影机的见缝插针。
在法国文化中心看完了这部德国电影，《最终处决》。看整部片子的过程中一直在想，人类通过人为地监禁、处罚、设定规则，给自己的同类带来的痛苦，如果具象地转化为实体，应该是一个不可估量的庞然大物。
笑场无数次 其中一次因为男主演技太差笑到浑身出汗
La réussite de cette revisite du classique musical repose largement sur la virtuosité inouïe de Spielberg en matière d'agacement de l'espace façonné par des jeux de lumières qui instaurent un clair-obscur magnifique ainsi que ces corps qui se meuvent au sein de ceci tout en dynamisant le cadre. De la reconstruction du coloris de la version originale par les filtres et l'étalonnage à la démonstration chorégraphique réactualisée, WSS 2021 bien au delà d' simple hommage devient lui même à son tour 1 monument de la comédie musicale. Mythique 4.5
太难看了，故事稀烂，逻辑稀碎，歌舞平平，又臭又长，主要男女主角太丑又没啥演技，如坐针毡啊。
虽然斯皮尔伯格的场面调度和音乐都堪称教科书式典范，但也拯救不了这部片过多的槽点。这是一个以男女主为核心的故事，但男女主的存在感竟然能比一众舞蹈群演的存在感还低，完全没有辨识度。更别说这个“我们相爱大过天，其他仇恨全靠边”的PUA式老套洗脑剧情，而且也没有拓展出更多的深度和可能性，小体量狗血恋爱大过天的故事撑不起2个半小时的时长，没想到看斯皮尔伯格的电影也会有这么如坐针毡的一天，失望透顶。
老版歌舞就浮夸过头，新版还在沿用，而且对于拉丁裔的呈现反而更加强化了刻板印象，口音增强实在受不了，好莱坞银幕上的拉丁裔不愧是比亚裔还要更弱势的群体。故事很明显就是白人圣母视角。画面滤镜感显的廉价，老版视觉基本碾压。
没看过原版的我，竟然觉得还不错。主要是故事本身太好了，每一环都是无可奈何的人性黑暗。
这对一见钟情的苦命鸳鸯……
还不如让tick tick…boom提名Oscar BP
就算是翻拍故事的核心也实在太老旧，服化和一些镜头调度是还不错，但是2021谁还要看这种boys will be boys/物化女性角色的青少年罗朱故事，Ansel眼神空洞到让人感叹坞里真的是没人了怕是来个机器人都能比他好，Jet和Sharks每个人都脸孔模糊到火拼看起来就是练舞室打架，看完除了一首tonight没有任何值得留在脑海里的东西
6.5/ 恋爱脑女主 冲动小白脸男主 尬的不行的trans 白男核心的身份认同 是时代的肤浅缩影 新瓶旧酒似乎也没在新时代给人更多的印象与思考
看完很难不鼓掌。老吐槽斯皮尔胳膊无聊、垃圾时间，但业务能力也是真的强，尤其这一部的质感方面做得相当好，几个镜头过去你就能体会到深厚的功力，好多略生硬的剧情也愣是通过各种手段遮过去了，仿佛在给同届《倒数时刻》上课。唯二美中不足的一是名唱段Somewhere略嫌草率，二是不明白为啥西班牙语部分没字幕…
音乐非常一般。大概是我看过音乐剧里音乐最平的一部。看完完全记不住任何旋律。剧情而言，这样古典色彩的桥段放在现代框架背景下真的格格不入。好几次男女主深情对唱我都觉得好尴尬…主角也是完全不出彩。比较喜欢开头那一段边跳舞边搞破坏，既优雅又街头的感觉。
现代版罗朱 好过时的文本 舞蹈编排得挺流畅的 男女主演技都呆若木鸡
好像什么都到位，但很奇怪，力不从心的感觉，故事就没能太有吸引力。
斯皮尔伯格的窘境在于他当年创造的影像风格成了当今好莱坞最常见的风格，即使把这种风格做到极致，我挑不出毛病，却也难以感受到太多惊喜
啊我觉得比原版好诶～tone比原版务实，街头感更强烈，打斗戏更狠一点但还保留有节奏感。真看个人喜好了，可能原版那样用华丽色彩反衬悲剧显得更shock更让人觉得唏嘘？
"Everything changed in America, except nothing changed in America."
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
