Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
为歌喉加一星，看预告的时候感觉可以冲奥，可能期待一下太高了……
完全符合观前的预期，没有不足但也没有惊艳。歌曲不错，不知道是不是现场收音。缺点就是作为名人的传记电影，我看到了一个传奇，一个偶像，一个icon，但是唯独没有看见一个活生生的人。这可是2个多小时的生平啊，叙述了很多事但都像在读名人报道，不够流畅联系也不紧密。
都是谁给了她心魔，又是谁带她走回光明。#靠近男人会变得不幸#
22.5.23: 在去LA的飞机上看的，其实之前刚到美国的时候想去电影院看，但是因为忙着开学就错过了。我觉得挺不错的，主要是AF奶奶的经历太过于传奇。JHud唱的也很不错
导演看监狱里伙食太好了刀疤越来越胖了 只好让他领饭盒去了
故事本身应该不错 只是讲故事的方法有些一般
这集稍微有点平淡了。
respect
流水线上的作品，节奏挺快，应该省略了不少细节。
这又是奥斯卡金像奖的热门影片，演唱俱佳，但对我们无感
流水线上的作品，节奏挺快，应该省略了不少细节。
豆瓣短评说得好，第一部为自由而逃，第二部被迫帮别人逃，第三部压根不想逃。这一部人气角色刀疤刚被洗白就惨遭杀害，也是够倒霉的。出狱的两个兄弟直接变成了客串。这个系列真希望继续下去啊！
（啊啊啊啊啊，看错电影了，标错了。。。。）
剪辑差点意思，但是目前这分也太低了，拉一把
如果我看的不是机翻的资源那就是剧情真的烂到看不懂
看了那么多的音乐人物传记，这部终于让音乐当了一回主角。看完电影的夜里，在找东野圭吾却翻到National Geographic，目录页里一眼就看见这电影的剧照，2021第4期112页有个专题Aretha’s Genius，刚要看就听见了贝斯弹的Amazing Grace，之前在电脑上找Victor Wooten写的《The Music Lesson》却翻到他的视频去了，当背景放着没有关，正巧播到2010年的一个演出，窗外花香随夜色浸进来，闭眼感受了一下，手上烫起的水泡依然隐隐作痛，并没有感觉到神恩降临。神啊，这点巧合还不够，让股票涨得厉害点吧，哈，渎神的势利眼就是我了
标准的美式暴力片，漏洞肯定有，也没啥好评价
我连续看了三部，只有第一部叫逃狱，后面两部叫防逃狱兄弟差不多。
@ grand cinema sunshine
你来我往，一会敌，一会友，以逃狱为名，却从未成功
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
