Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
也可以联想到对美开放后，富一代们是用什么换取今天的财富的。
南美这几年在国际电影节上亮相的作品都是既尖锐又写实的 看完之后不由唏嘘好久 这根本不是什么斯德哥尔摩综合症 对我而言 这就是Good ending
如果在议员选举时把黑心产业链曝光就是爽剧级别，但结果是自甘被驯化，倒也算赤裸裸的现实。
我们已经喜欢了解数学题 却不再知道解数学题的意义是什么 也不会寻找数学本身的过程之美
只会努力的人第二个放弃
还有一点。不要自怜！！！！！
原来哪里都有这种“顺势而为”的人呐 比拿着枪指着你脑袋，还是洗脑忠诚度更高啊
6分，虽说整个脱北形象还是幻想居多，但已经不停留在苦大仇深的1.0时代了，开始融入类型片，哪怕套路。
还行吧，就是感觉剧情有点拖拉就是，一直想让人快进的感觉，后面有被燃到，前面铺垫的时间有点长了，导演如果再精简点，更突然数学上的造诣，会更好 。
一个会弹钢琴，会下围棋，内心正义的数学家来教你数学课的故事。当然，还有必不可少的南北对立元素。
我跟着马图斯一起挣扎，每当我觉得有机会救出劳工，他就会把兄弟们推得更远，但我其实总觉得他良心未泯，电影里没有充足的理由去说服我他最后的转变。
屠龙勇士，最后成为了龙。
角色的转变就是这么自然，所以不要相信小地方的人当了官会为小地方的人谋福利，可能压榨的更恶劣。
故事很治愈 一个逃亡在韩国的朝鲜数学家 一个家境贫穷试图拼搏的年轻人互相救赎的故事 政治线确实稍显干瘪 不过整体效果很不错啦！（和女学生弹钢琴那段真的很感动！感慨数学乃至科学的美妙）
这是一部很有意思的小品电影，底层人民互害，想活下去，想过上好日子，那就得拍上面的人的马屁，给人卖命，这条链上的赢家只有坐在最上面的富人。在这种盘剥下，真正敢站出来打碎阶级压迫的人才是英雄，只是这部电影里没有，有的是摇摆不定的普通人。
八股小电影，但是终于懂了很多人觉得数学之美是什么美了。
有屠龙之志的少年最后还是成为了那条恶龙，想起集中营里管理犯人的工头…最大的恶龙竟然是参选的议员…
评分这么低？这是我22年第一季度以来看过的最佳电影。
只有好电影才会让你越来越爱看电影。什么是好电影？那一定是讲人性的。这部电影展现的恶让你有共鸣，时时抓住你的感官，看这样的电影才会不觉得一两个小时很漫长。
还行吧，就是感觉剧情有点拖拉就是，一直想让人快进的感觉，后面有被燃到，前面铺垫的时间有点长了，导演如果再精简点，更突然数学上的造诣，会更好 。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
