Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
6.8/10影片翻拍自韩国电影《世上最美的离别》，记得当时真的是哭的不能自已。
哭的我口罩都湿透了，鼻涕眼泪分不清。徐帆演技真的太好了！非常能让人共情
反感这种苦情的母爱，既塑料又程式化，我们对母亲的形象一直都是这种牺牲的、痛苦的、忍耐的，难道母亲只有这一种形象吗？
这部电影总体来说还行吧，不太是我喜欢的类型，剧情也有些尬，能看就行。
好像看懂了，又好像没懂，终究是我没有一颗纤弱而又敏感的心。
前面感觉一直在被喂屎，爱酱虽然变态但自己也很痛苦吧，雪真的好呀撒西，两个变态的故事啊！！这个结尾加一星哈哈哈哈哈
这是我见过最累的妈妈，也是最咄咄逼人的妈妈，这女儿是我见过最叛逆最气人的女儿之一。她像是所有人的妈妈，为了每个人而操劳，为了每个人而活，却唯独活得不像自己。张歆艺的刘玫似乎更让人能感受到正能量，演技也好。徐帆说话太做作了。全片每个人都不咋正常，都有人性的缺陷，这么多千奇百怪的奇葩角色，人物间的冲突矛盾却出奇的简单，虽然哭的我鼻涕一把泪一把，但艺术展现我并不认可。
我觉得剧情真的很感人啊，看得我一直在哭得稀里哗啦，从此以后我一定要好好和我妈在一起
电影只配两星，再多一星看在这个电影提了妈妈，所以是给我妈的
我祈祷小爱最后是真的喜欢上了美雪，而不是因为得不到男主的爱而对她产生报复性的喜欢，至少电影最后，我看到她对女二是有了占有欲，如果说之前是被男主拒绝而失恋的颓废，可是最后看到美雪和男主惺惺相惜时，她眼光无神是因为女二吧？
导演手法生涩，不会转场，都是生硬的淡入淡出。对演员表演也不太有调节能力。主角的情感与身份设计包罗是挺全的，母亲，姐姐，妻子，媳妇，包括少女时独立个体。但冲击与感染力比较泛于表层。像陈明昊完全该有一场爆发的戏来给全片添彩的。导演浪费了他。
如果是在现实中和女主交往做朋友应该会很头疼，但作为银幕的观众而言，我真的挺喜欢她的。
可别提阿莫多瓦了，但凡创作者有阿莫多瓦一半的先锋性、冒犯性，也不至于拍出如此陈旧的作品。
“我们再睡一次吧。”
哭是因为母亲这个角色，但整部电影所有角色都感觉游离在生活之外，就像是那种临时搭了棚，临时做了一场表演，没有生活感，更没有历史感。
青岛好，北京也不错啊，把我逗乐了。
憋不出话了，总之是全程问号脸…… 补：两星给船戏和两女主角
加油李小美！加油张婧仪！
这电影的目的就是让你哭，从开头哭到结尾，含泪看完，但是真心不喜欢这类题材。
本来因为是文艺片，结果好残暴，爱死这类题材了！山田星奈诚不欺我！！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
