Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
王炸卡司，稀烂剧情，既无逻辑又无趣，Ryan Reynolds是从小贱贱中走不出来了。
毕竟这些元素就和复合调料配菜一个理，无需逻辑和大脑，吃完能记得爽了1小时就合格。
emmmmmmm，虽然都是我喜欢的明星，但这就像一部故事比较俗套的，巨大的广告片。片头模仿成龙，呵呵，但喜剧感出不来！越狱、动作、追车、美女、反转...... 好像什么都拍了，又都浅尝辄止，提不上劲！爆米花片约，赚钱嘛，不寒碜！
长达半小时小贱贱和光头森的打嘴炮功夫之后，再给你半小时的标准美式爆米花爽片，最后莫名其妙三个人贱兮兮开启下一个征途。盖尔加朵的美丽也提不起任何兴趣，从头到尾充斥一股吊儿郎当的味道，给你喂一口屎再给你一口糖，二倍速都难以瞎玩。how dare you！
4.0/合格且高于期望一丢丢，完全不能更传统的好莱坞式神偷外片加家庭快乐爆米花风格片，但还是看得开心啊。虽然已经深谙瑞恩一贯的套路和风格但是依然吃这套，三个人，奇怪的组合，意外的可爱。
大数据电影属实。找了三位坞里如今最红的商业动作片明星，打戏却设计的那么难看
三个人之间的化学反应如同道恩强森的头一样，毫-无。
挺不错的一部剧，就是可惜了有些剧情我依然无法理解。
拍电影就好好拍电影，非要玩概念，扯什么“电影的社交属性”……尼玛但凡好电影，能发人深省的，都能引发别人的讨论，例如《小丑》。而不是本末倒置，放着剧情、演技、叙事这些硬件不好好打磨，去追逐什么扯淡的“社交属性”！电影拍的那么烂，你想让观众讨论什么？讨论你这部电影有多烂吗？这和明星不惜自曝丑闻追逐曝光率有什么区别吗？真是人至贱则无敌。
“做什么不重要，人们觉得你做了什么才重要。”
无聊的搞笑，无趣的反转，流水线化的犯罪喜剧片
有点山寨《纵横四海》的感觉。
呵呵，不好意思我们没有哭。完全是蒙钱的啊呀。我怎么感觉她的舅舅就像陈木胜拍动作片完全是一模一样！
前有阿里ip宇宙剧本，今有网飞大数据剧本，特点鲜明:什么都有，唯独没有灵魂
《红色通缉令》又名
期待两年，今天终于在75寸杜比影院级电视上看完了，总的7分！
①直升机给火箭弹来个穿堂而过，惊险，聪明②达斯警官在世界各地都有执法权
元素不要太多，博物馆盗窃，西伯利亚越狱，高科技破译，南美探险，二战神秘藏宝，一会丛林，一会印第安纳琼斯，一会两个男的调情斗嘴。意思不大，但反正还算欢乐。
emmmmmmm，虽然都是我喜欢的明星，但这就像一部故事比较俗套的，巨大的广告片。片头模仿成龙，呵呵，但喜剧感出不来！越狱、动作、追车、美女、反转...... 好像什么都拍了，又都浅尝辄止，提不上劲！爆米花片约，赚钱嘛，不寒碜！
剧情麻麻，既不过脑也不走肾，什么都想稍稍沾点，元素多而乱，也没什么笑点，台词倒是埋了不少彩蛋，反派摆设，警方道具人，小贱贱还是那个小贱贱演法，加朵的脸就算再努力使坏还是出戏（难道是因为那blingbling的大眼睛？）三个喜欢的演员凑在一起结果却并没有期待中的化学反应，相对来说巨石这个角色还稍微ok，结尾就算能拍得了下一部我也不准备看了
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
