-
视频
视频
资讯
视频
资讯
Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
即使是一包免费的零食，经过手都能留下利益，这就是政治和资本。一旦被政治和资本渗透绑架，即便是科学极致的现实，也能被花样包装，进而层层剥削。年度最佳黑色喜剧，以末日倒数为主线，呈现众生反智，以及一小拨人螳臂当车，然而，即便末世确切到来，人们也不过如此——新冠早已预演。所谓荒诞，其实距离我们并不遥远。
有意思，撞击危机演变成政治和资本联合的闹剧。发现彗星，减肥开始，减肥结束，地球毁灭。演员阵容太强大了。
8.7 对于《2001》的逆向重写，几乎是完全高效且协调的，用肆无忌惮地嬉笑掩盖无能为力的虚无，末日喜剧所夹杂着的无限悲伤被不断削减又愈发强盛，迎来必然发生的结局，也许有一些小小变数。看Adam Mckay的电影你到底在期待些什么?
气候问题的焦虑；结尾的第七封印式的等待；数不过来影帝影后的卡司；看似讽刺了许多实际流于表面的无力；网飞的电视剧味道总是挥之不去。
娱乐精神是有的，多好笑吧，不觉得。中国人在毫不自知的笑话外国人这件事上，一直都一样
太肤浅又无聊了，像一帮 MBA 参加政治讽刺写作兴趣班搞出来的课堂作业
笑得hin开心！出发点comet是气候变化，现在看来也可以是疫情及其它任何专业群体与大众的矛盾关系，可以看作是后疫情时代作者电影的intro了，就是不仅仅纪录当下，而从humanity层面的对这两年经历的讨论吧。这个选角做得很妙，还是群戏，真好，甚至感觉小李子（大李子？）得奥斯卡得早了，大魔王都认不出来了。就是的确还有点浮，毕竟是更像一次应激反应。和冯提尔的《忧郁症》可以对比阅读，前疫情时代的地球毁灭是个体心灵世界的崩塌，后疫情时代难道只能大社会+泛家庭的讨论么？终究还是要回到个体心灵世界的。
挺有趣的剪辑，有在故意制造焦虑和靠近宏大叙事。表演过于浮夸，消解了大部分现实意义，也让影片从政治喜剧跌落至滑稽闹剧。/ 2022第一部
并没有提供什么新的思考。喜见Mark Rylance。
说是喜剧，介是个悲剧，说是悲剧，介是个喜剧。拧巴有余，食材不足，毕竟美利坚那边的事儿，我们看着是隔靴搔痒，high不太起来。
？这啥啊？也太无聊了吧？不足够好笑也不够愤怒，建议导演早日脱离对政治片的执念…
为什么日本人不敢想？
贪嗔痴傻愚昧狂妄又自大的人类。
对时政的嘲讽度拉满！很多以前觉得纯夸张的情节在后疫情时代都变成了现实批判，这个观感本身就很讽刺了🙂
真厉害，目瞪口呆，害怕，好笑。哈哈哈哈哈。我们当然互相同情，彼此提醒。在这个把我们注意力干稀巴烂，集体思考水平低下的年代。但下这样的断言只能是个电影，没有人有资格去给这个正在发生的时空做评判。否则就是另外一个喜剧电影的主题了。也有可能是这个灾难太tm大，除了珍惜身边美好的一切，确实也没好办法。但是喜剧是喜剧，痛快点呈现某个片段就行了。有可能呢，聪明的人早就做好准备，就好像躺平的人说我们曾经真的努力过。这个喜剧也太悲伤了吧，就好像话都让他说完了，剩下一个傻仔在独自喊妈妈。就真的和真的一样，没法辩驳。但也蛮开心，末日来临都一样，还不如真诚点。每个小群体行为都有道理，但无法达成更大范围的共识，除非某类人毁灭，这才是最可怕的事情
好严肃一片子！演着演着就开始往艺术片的方向走，然后就出现了一些动人时刻，挺有趣的。（BTW，最后那个彩蛋实在是太愚蠢了，大减分）
说真话的科学家，政府会让他们“隐身”；政客永远能找到争夺权力的机会，哪怕是从灾难中，而商人的眼里灾难自然也是商机；他们自以为掌控一切，也自以为备好了后路；媒体只看收看率；庸众永远互相撕裂……
又贵又臭又长，有请广电局来剪下吧。黑到世界末日，结局好看。★★/4.7
2.5; an exhausting clusterfuck that downgrades serious subject matters into distracting, repetitious, divisive caricatures; the satirical value lies not in its preachy, on-the-nose screenplay, but in how much this mess parallels reality @Concordia
现实世界跟这个电影一样荒唐啦，不要大惊小怪。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
