Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
故事里的主人公，一切诉求只为让政府重视qj问题，但很可惜，这么简简单单的案件，至今在印度没有得到改善。
该谴责的人太多，强奸犯，不作为的警察等等。。
故事里的主人公，一切诉求只为让政府重视qj问题，但很可惜，这么简简单单的案件，至今在印度没有得到改善。
把挟持人质事件写的跟幼儿园过家家一样，劫持既不迫在眉睫也不是唯一手段，讨巧的点就在于用了女主的经历作为事件的出口，情感是真诚的，但形式刻意了，且细节不能细究。但总比《门锁》那样的全员恶人的愣头青式写法强，女主起码伪装成恶人做了一件正义的事。技术上是可以更合理一些的。豆瓣但凡跟女拳沾边的作品分数全部虚高。
一己之力推动立法，girls help girls
如果想获取自己的合法权益，只能通过这种极端的方式的话，那么这个国家没救了。一直不能理解印度人这方面是怎么想的，强奸，轮奸，而且是暴力的，不知道做这件事时有没有想过自己的亲人？谁能给我解解惑。
一方面剧情狗血，一方面女主深沉内敛的表演和人物性格，真的一点割裂。尤其是镜头语言上突然的暖光突然的虚化，真的就是风格不统一。
几种关系之间的力很巧妙，虽然刻意但都有效，也没刻意得过界。演技确实太稳了。
女性就算当上了总理 还是要看男人的脸色 还是会被性别歧视觉得女性就是情绪化的 看的我越来越生气 女主真的好勇敢好酷啊
反转都留在最后了，清晰简单的故事，结合印度国情来看挺有现实意义。男警察的枪有点欧亨利的味儿了。
甚至
结局基本能猜到，但还是震惊于影片的结束语，有些人，一出生就在地狱……
太震撼了，又是印度常见qj题材，但却能不断翻出花来。感官刺激之外这个故事很需要人们反思，当一个平民以身试险，用犯罪制裁犯罪的时候，国家还能有救吗？
love is pain, love is complicated
当你是一个人，去面对整个社会的排斥的时候，是很压抑的
与今年的开端有异曲同工之处，似乎解决社会议题最硬核的方式不是问题本身，反其道而行之的放大却成了正解。这种社会根部的病态在放大镜下被暴露的体无完肤，犹如这部电影突如其来的一个个印度式切镜，闪的你不得不心中有数。
振聋发聩！！！！印度这个国家，总能拍出这种撼动人心的电影，却依旧活得那样烂入泥沼……可悲可叹。
复仇剧 女主策划绑架，只为见总理，以自身为视角揭露印度强奸的严重性
桑德拉布洛克用演技撑起的大女主戏，故事很简单，但是张力很强，最后的真相略牵强。
三分之一就能预料剧情，却又在结局被谁是真凶吓了一跳。为国家命运而持续发声的印度电影，和真不咋地的印度国情，真是讽刺。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
