Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
但凡被殺的不是有錢人的女兒，律師口中的公平正義真相都會變成口嗨，這是一個以黑治黑的故事，不過是用律師當了槍手，用法律做了包裝。另外，很不喜歡這些男性主導的港片裡呈現的女性形象，純純的工具人，對劇情發展沒有半分推動意義，像是一個花瓶，只是用來生育。編劇不會寫可以不要寫，別老是用女性角色襯托男性的偉光正。
不像电影，像tvb剧的一集。最后真凶能够归案不是法律和公理的胜利，全靠死者父亲的地位和财力。这个设置让整个故事的内核都变得很没说服力。看在廖叔份上给个三星吧。
剧情太呆了，二十分钟已经知道凶手是谁，政界和商界头目，面对亲生子女的生死，也不过是动用了一个黑警，三四个混混。。。格局小了，浪费几位演员的演技
属实一般。如果死者是个普通家庭的孩子就彻底犯案无望了。正义还是没有伸张，或者说根本没法伸张，只是钻了法律的空子而已。
电影不应该拍的像TVB电视剧。情节是完整的，以前现在未来同样有逻辑联系。男主明显是古美门式的律师，正义但又不死板。问题在于本片看完，最大的感受是“正义要通过有钱才能打破”，并且所有的重大问题都是靠死者爸爸翻盘，这就丧失了一级指控的“指控”的重量表现内涵了——特别是找检控的时候，竟然只是花钱买问题？我还以为要体现检控辩护共锤真正的犯罪者的桥段。整体表现远远不如多年前的《全民目击》。甚至我短评有一点剧透，我都觉得无伤大雅。
觉得还不错啊，不知为何评分这么低。看的粤语版。
与其说是律政剧，不如说是复仇片，剧情依靠老戏骨张力十足，可整条主线无关法律公正，只有政商钱，有些剧情处理得当（控方律师），可惜以后没有这种片了。
理想条件下描写的法律不能让人忘记现实中的法律是什么样子
最后一段律师发言好评。
作为律政剧，它把律师们当了空气；作为刑侦剧，它把警察们当了空气；作为主旋律剧，它把观众当了空气。三星给还在坚守香港电影的老戏骨。
为什么总有智障的导演，找到脑瘫编剧，傻逼演员，拍的智障电影，投资方是智障吗？当然不是，就是为了洗钱吧。这些娱乐圈人渣们，就不能学学韩国棒子，美国佬好好拍电影赚钱吗？赚到钱了，就算都烂成这样，都不觉得羞耻吗？？娱乐圈就是脸皮厚啊，那么多不要脸无知之徒的人，在里面骗钱。
小混混运气值爆棚啊，睡了富二代、被诬陷打赢了官司，直接开直播肯定能发财
智叔走好，片子就一TVB律政剧加长版的感觉。
游艇上的对手戏抢眼有张力。有钱有势才能互相制衡，这不过是一场政治与经济的博弈。
意料之中的故事情节 除了女主和廖以外 演技一般
从19年到21年，鸡蛋与高墙，又是权钱交易又是黑警的，还有方中信最后的独白金句，十分切合时势了。开头一段交叉剪接本来拍得好好的，接着却很快把陈家乐的角色放在了次要位置，然后又生硬地把两位大状的取态近乎是调转了。整个故事走向和人物塑造，也很粗糙跳跃，无法令人信服。电影最后对鸡蛋撼高墙争取公义貌似给出了一丝希望，只是很讽刺地香港以后还会不会有这样题材的电影都是未知之数吧。
只有有钱人才能对抗有钱人，穷人，看什么电影，挣钱去aq
智叔遗作，一看到主角阵容就容易想起之前tvb经典的律政剧《律政强人》。东方李察基尔方中信确实很适合演律师，睿智的眼神，正气的形象很贴合。我看的粤语版，也算原汁原味吧，看国语配音版就比较吃亏，会嫌弃。谭耀文这次不再演坏人了，而一路向西的男主咋看都是坏！整体剧情还是有点不足，结局那一番正义凛然的发言应该就是能过审的原因吧，正能量满满呢！
如果死去的女孩不是富豪家的孩子，这场审判可能就没有转折了。
剧情没有什么悬念，给方中信一颗星，还是那么有型。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
