Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
最多算个罪案片，奈何剧情简单的仿佛小学生写的，一共就几个主要角色，凶手明显的就差写脑门上了，作案动机无趣至极，还隔这写丈夫和闺蜜出轨的桥段，有够老土的
人们总是愿意看富豪的喜剧，不愿看穷人的生活，毕竟后者贴身太近。
这部电影准确来说像纪录片，太侧重描述环境，而忽略的第一视角的情感的带动与渲染。感觉像硬凑了90分钟。
你想看的它都有系列，两个陪酒郎也太没有职业道德了
我喜欢。
一个丧女的登山妈妈来救援一个失恋的大男孩的故事，实际是2个失去希望的人通过不同的寻死方式，最终找到了继续活下去的理由。最好看的部分也就最后十分钟的样子，2人的碰面对话，来解释2个人的心理状态和变化。
所以海边的监控怎么解释？警察看不出来是他老公？？！！这编剧是在校生吧。
Hmmmmm，怎么说呢，在Netflix的世界里男人可能都是自私冷酷又充满了劣根性的，可以说是厌男恐婚第一名，想想都令人颤栗。。Queen B大概是为了逃脱那个“精致”的头衔吧，有时候剧本是那样，别怪演员了。总而言之，学会几招保命招式，还是很必要的。
无巧不成影，但要知道过犹不及，惊悚刺激过过瘾了。
真希望这个片子能让54岁的闹米阿姨赚两三千万。
作为一个肥皂剧看还是很有意思，比国内那些看着就尴尬的剧好太多了
前边还行，后边简直有点莫名其妙了。Queen B当年在Gossip Girls里边多美，现在是为了走实力演员路线吗，还是为了贴近这个刚生完孩子的角色，形象上牺牲还挺大。bug还是有点硬吧，比如闺蜜和老公的信息明明是闺蜜缠着老公，到老公的闪回就变成闺蜜很潇洒但老公不肯放手了。还有明明房子门口有监控，海边也有，却没拍到老公吗？反正就是无脑看看还可以，不能细想。还有这女主怎么总藏不住事呢，你就不能有什么事等到了安全的地方再说再报警，非要自己一次又一次的跟嫌疑犯对峙也是绝了，没死只能说编剧对你好
翻拍西班牙2016年的的《我们是贵族》，父亲还不错
还心疼没啥存在感的警察，连个监控录像也看不好。
第1647部,你以为你给你孩子们上了一课,结果被摆了一道。
具有一定的可看性，但所有反转豆设计感太重，为了反转而反转，感觉被编剧按头玩弄了。gueenb混的着实有点惨。
抖音看了个讲解，再自己电视补个结局，一般般吧
#跟着网飞看电影系列 非常老套的你的闺蜜跟的丈夫搞在一起，闺蜜觉得对不起你要分手约你旅行准备摊牌，丈夫飞来杀了闺蜜。你还以为闺蜜失踪报案追踪，中间被误以为凶手的警察意外死亡结案，最终在丈夫外套发现闺蜜死前带着你送的项链上一颗珠子，over。
亲爱的爸爸妈妈，你们装了三十几年了，别装了，好吗
法国喜剧简单粗暴，只是偶尔听听法语有点开心
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
